Skip to:

Biomechanical assessment and fatigue characteristics of an articulating nucleus implant

Nathaniel R. Ordway, MS,1 William F. Lavelle, MD,1 Tim Brown, MS,2 Q-Bin Bao, PhD3

1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 2Pioneer Surgical Technology, Marquette, MI 3Bonovo Orthopedics, Beijing, P R China

Abstract 

Background

Extrusion is a known complication of lumbar nucleus replacement devices. Despite this fact, this complication has not been well studied in an in vitro cadaveric model under fatigue-loading conditions.

Methods

Lumbar constructs (with treated and control levels) were tested in intact, postdisectomy, and postnucleus implant conditions under compression, torsion, and bending for initial biomechanical assessment. Constructs were then tested for 100(k) cycles under fatigue loading to assess extrusion risk. Potential adverse effects to vertebral and endplate fractures were assessed using gross dissection and macroscopic and micro-computed tomography evaluation techniques.

Results

Based on the initial biomechanical assessment, implantation of the nucleus device significantly increased disc height compared with the discectomy condition, and there were no significant differences between the intact and implanted conditions for range of motion or stiffness. All constructs completed the 100(k) cycles with no extrusions. There was evidence of implant shift toward the right lateral annulus on postfatigue images. Postfatigue dissection and imaging showed no evidence of macroscopic endplate or trabecular fractures.

Conclusion

Using a 2-level lumbar in vitro construct, the biomechanical function of the treated level with an articulating nucleus implant was similar to intact. In vitro fatigue testing showed no implant extrusion and macroscopic changes to the bony structure or cartilaginous endplates when comparing treated and intact levels.

keywords: 
lumbar spine, intervertebral disc, nucleus replacement, Disc height, Lateral bending, range of motion
Volume 7
doi: 
10.1016/j.ijsp.2013.10.001