PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Patel, Madhav R.
AU  - Jacob, Kevin C.
AU  - Chavez, Frank A.
AU  - DesLaurier, Justin T.
AU  - Pawlowski, Hanna
AU  - Prabhu, Michael C.
AU  - Vanjani, Nisheka N.
AU  - Singh, Kern
TI  - Impact of Body Mass Index on Postsurgical Outcomes for Workers’ Compensation Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
AID  - 10.14444/8309
DP  - 2022 Aug 01
TA  - International Journal of Spine Surgery
PG  - 595--604
VI  - 16
IP  - 4
4099  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/16/4/595.short
4100  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/16/4/595.full
SO  - Int J Spine Surg2022 Aug 01; 16
AB  - Background Increased morbidity associated with obesity imposes a greater financial burden on companies that provide insurance to their employees. Few studies have investigated the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) in the workers’ compensation (WC) population.Methods WC patients who underwent a primary, single-level MIS TLIF were included/grouped according to BMI: nonobese (<30 kg/m2); obese I (≥30, <35 kg/m2); severe + morbid (≥35). PROMs were collected pre- and postoperatively: visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) physical composite score (PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF). BMI predictive power grouping on PROMs was evaluated using simple linear regression. Established minimum clinically important difference values were used to compute achievement rates across PROMs using logistic regression.Results A total of 116 nonobese, 70 obese I, and 61 severe + morbid patients were included. Demographics among BMI grouping significantly differed in gender, hypertensive status, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P ≤ 0.037, all). Operative time was significantly different in perioperative values among BMI grouping (P ≤ 0.001). Increased BMI was significantly associated with greater VAS back at 12 weeks and 2 years (P ≤ 0.026, all), greater ODI preoperatively at 12 weeks and 6 months (P ≤ 0.015, all), and decreased PROMIS-PF at 12 weeks (P ≤ 0.011, all). Mean PROMs between obese I and severe + morbid cohorts differed in SF-12 PCS at 12 weeks, only (P = 0.050). ODI overall was the only parameter for which minimum clinically important difference was achieved among BMI cohorts (P ≤ 0.023).Conclusion WC patients with increased BMI were more likely to develop significant back pain and disability at numerous postoperative timepoints compared with nonobese individuals. Our findings highlight the weight management importance within WC population to minimize back pain and disability following MIS TLIF, but provide a sense of reassurance with comparable clinical improvement regardless of BMI.Clinical Relevance When considering the effect of weight, surgeons may incorporate these findings in managing patient expectations in the WC population undergoing lumbar spine surgery.Level of Evidence When considering the effect of weight, surgeons may incorporate these findings in managing patient expectations in the WC population undergoing lumbar spine surgery.