PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Nunley, Pierce D.
AU  - Hisey, Michael
AU  - Smith, Micah
AU  - Stone, Marcus B.
TI  - Cervical Disc Arthroplasty vs Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at 10 Years: Results From a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial at 3 Sites
AID  - 10.14444/8431
DP  - 2023 Apr 01
TA  - International Journal of Spine Surgery
PG  - 230--240
VI  - 17
IP  - 2
4099  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/17/2/230.short
4100  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/17/2/230.full
SO  - Int J Spine Surg2023 Apr 01; 17
AB  - Background Over the past 20 years, multiple randomized controlled trials have shown cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) to be safe and effective for treating 1- and 2-level degenerative disc disease (DDD). The purpose of this postmarket study is to compare 10-year outcomes between CDA and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) from a randomized study at 3 centers.Methods This study was a continuation of a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing CDA with the Mobi-C cervical disc (Zimmer Biomet) vs ACDF. Following completion of the 7-year US Food and Drug Administration study, 10-year follow-up was obtained from consenting patients at 3 high-enrolling centers. The clinical and radiographic endpoints collected at 10 years included composite success, Neck Disability Index, neck and arm pain, short form-12, patient satisfaction, adjacent-segment pathology, major complications, and subsequent surgery.Results A total of 155 patients were enrolled (105 CDA; 50 ACDF). Follow-up was obtained from 78.1% of patients eligible after 7 years. At 10 years, CDA demonstrated superiority to ACDF. Composite success was 62.4% in CDA and 22.2% in ACDF (P < 0.0001). The cumulative risk of subsequent surgery at 10 years was 7.2% vs 25.5% (P = .001), and the risk of adjacent-level surgery was 3.1% vs 20.5% (P = .0005) in CDA vs ACDF, respectively. The progression to radiographically significant adjacent-segment pathology at 10 years was lower in CDA vs ACDF (12.9% vs 39.3%; P = 0.006). At 10 years, patient-reported outcomes and change from baseline were generally better in CDA patients. A higher percentage of CDA patients reported they were “very satisfied” at 10 years (98.7% vs 88.9%; P = 0.05).Conclusions In this postmarket study, CDA was superior to ACDF for treating symptomatic cervical DDD. CDA was statistically superior to ACDF for clinical success, subsequent surgery, and neurologic success. Results through 10 years demonstrate that CDA continues to be a safe and effective surgical alternative to fusion.Clinical Relevance The results of this study support the long-term safety and effectiveness of cervical disc arthroplasty with the Mobi-C.Level of Evidence 1.