PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Arunakul, Rattalerk
AU  - Boonraksa, Thanapat
AU  - Pinitchanon, Punnawit
AU  - Siribumrungwong, Koopong
AU  - Suntharapa, Thongchai
AU  - Pholsawatchai, Waroot
TI  - Efficacy of Epidural Steroid in Controlling Pain After Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
AID  - 10.14444/8655
DP  - 2024 Oct 23
TA  - International Journal of Spine Surgery
PG  - 8655
4099  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/early/2024/10/13/8655.short
4100  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/early/2024/10/13/8655.full
AB  - Background The effects of epidural steroid (ES) administration following open or minimally invasive surgery lumbar discectomy have been extensively studied. However, no research has investigated the impact of steroids following the unilateral biportal technique endoscopic lumbar discectomy (UBE-D) for lumbar disc herniation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ES administration in controlling postoperative pain and disability scores following UBE-D for single-level lumbar disc herniation.Methods This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted between June 2021 and June 2023. Eighty-two patients were assessed, and 60 were eligible and randomized to receive either ES (n = 30) or saline (placebo; n = 30) after UBE-D. The Outcome measures included visual analog scale scores for pain, Oswestry Disability Index scores, morphine consumption over 24 hours, serum C-reactive protein levels, and the occurrence of complications over a 6-month follow-up period.Results The baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups, with no significant differences observed. Analysis of visual analog scale scores for back and leg pain, as well as Oswestry Disability Index scores, at various postoperative time points (6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months), showed no statistically significant differences between the ES and placebo groups (P values ranged from 0.47–0.94). Additionally, no significant differences were found in morphine consumption within the first 24 hours postoperatively (P = 0.85), length of hospital stay (P = 0.36), or C-reactive protein levels at 24 hours and 3 weeks postoperatively (P values ranged from 0.54–0.79) between the 2 groups. Importantly, no postoperative or steroid-related complications were reported in either group within the 6-month follow-up period.Conclusions ES administration after UBE-D did not significantly reduce postoperative pain, disability scores, or morphine consumption compared with placebo. The findings suggest that routine use of ESs in this context may not provide additional benefits.Clinical Relevance Clinicians should reconsider the use of epidural steroids as part of standard postoperative management after UBE-D, as the lack of significant improvement in patient outcomes indicates that alternative pain management strategies may be more effective.Level of Evidence 1.