PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Auerbach, Joshua D.
AU  - Namdari, Surena
AU  - Milby, Andrew H.
AU  - White, Andrew P.
AU  - Reddy, Sudheer C.
AU  - Lonner, Baron S.
AU  - Balderston, Richard A.
TI  - The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
AID  - 10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR
DP  - 2008 Jan 01
TA  - International Journal of Spine Surgery
PG  - 184--188
VI  - 2
IP  - 4
4099  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/2/4/184.short
4100  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/2/4/184.full
SO  - Int J Spine Surg2008 Jan 01; 2
AB  - Background Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR.We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on “by hand” and on “gold standard” flexionextension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion.Methods Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined.Results Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N = 16, P = .92) or accuracy (N = 16, P = 0.86) or intraobserver precision (N = 8, P = .09) or accuracy (N = 8, P = 0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements.Conclusions Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15° from the device center.Clinical Relevance Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement.