PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Srivastava, Sudhir AU - Roy, Kunal AU - Bhosale, Sunil AU - Marathe, Nandan AU - Raj, Aditya AU - Agarwal, Rishi TI - Outcome Analysis of Subaxial Cervical Spine Tuberculosis Operated by the Anterior Approach: A Single-Center Experience AID - 10.14444/8002 DP - 2021 Feb 01 TA - International Journal of Spine Surgery PG - 18--25 VI - 15 IP - 1 4099 - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/15/1/18.short 4100 - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/15/1/18.full SO - Int J Spine Surg2021 Feb 01; 15 AB - Background: Though spinal tuberculosis has a predilection for the dorsal and lumbar spine, a high percentage of morbidity and mortality is associated with cervical tuberculosis. Cervical tuberculosis accounts for about 10% of cases, with the major concerns being quadriparesis/quadriplegia and kyphotic deformity. Herein we describe our experience with the use of anterior instrumentation with titanium implants in 46 patients with subaxial tuberculosis.Materials and Methods: Included in the study were a total of 46 patients with subaxial cervical (C3-C7) and upper dorsal (D1-D3) tuberculosis who underwent operations with anterior debridement, decompression, bone grafting, and anterior instrumentation by a single surgeon at our institute between January 2007 and December 2014. A review of the demographic data, medical records, and x-rays before and after surgery and at subsequent follow-ups was performed retrospectively from the departmental database.Results: Neurological involvement in the postoperative period was seen in 29 of the 30 patients, 26 of whom showed complete neurological recovery. The Cobb angle at presentation ranged from 2°–58° of kyphosis with an average kyphosis of 15.4°. The average lordosis after surgery was found to be 17.5° (ie, a mean correction of 32.9°).Conclusions: Anterior instrumentation of subaxial cervical tuberculosis with titanium implants provides good correction of kyphosis and provides reasonable neurologic recovery in patients and ensures a long-lasting functional outcome.Level of evidence: 4.