PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Díaz-Romero, RICARDO
AU  - Henríquez, Manuel Sosa
AU  - Melián, Kevin Armas
AU  - Balhen-Martin, Claudia
TI  - Practice Patterns of Spine Surgeons Regarding Osteoporosis: An International Survey
AID  - 10.14444/8049
DP  - 2021 Apr 01
TA  - International Journal of Spine Surgery
PG  - 376--385
VI  - 15
IP  - 2
4099  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/15/2/376.short
4100  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/15/2/376.full
SO  - Int J Spine Surg2021 Apr 01; 15
AB  - Background: Osteoporosis (OP) represents a great challenge for the spine surgeon. Despite having effective pharmacological treatments for OP and surgical technical innovations, the awareness of spine surgeons regarding OP seems low. The purpose of this research was to assess practice patterns on the diagnosis and treatment of spine surgeons regarding OP.Methods: An electronic survey of ten multiple-choice questions was administered to members of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). The survey asked about the specialty, the workplace, and practice patterns and attitudes regarding OP and spine fusion surgery, pseudoarthrosis, and vertebral compression fractures (VCF).Results: A total of 122 surgeons completed the survey. In patients with suspected OP, 31.4% of surgeons would refer the patient to the OP specialist before surgery and 21.5% chose to perform the surgery without additional studies. A 66.4% of respondents would modify the surgical strategy in the case of OP. The most popular surgical techniques elected were cemented augmented screws (77.9%) and long-segment instrumentation (45.1%). Regarding pseudoarthrosis, 29.5% of surgeons opted to refer to the OP specialist, and 23.8% didn't consider any additional studies Concerning VCF management, 41.32% of respondents would refer the patient for treatment of OP, and the most common therapeutic strategy was conservatively treatment for 4 to 6 weeks and vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty if no improvement (55.74%).There was a higher proportion of surgeons that would not consider preoperative studies or referring patients with suspected OP for spine surgery (χ2 = 4.48, P = .03) and pseudoarthrosis (χ2 = 9.5, P = .002) compared to VCF.Conclusions: There was a greater awareness regarding optimizing OP management in VCF compared to patients with suspected OP for spine arthrodesis or pseudoarthrosis. There still opportunities for improvement for the timely diagnosis and treatment of OP in spine surgery patients.