PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Shepard, Nicholas A.
AU  - Rush, Augustus J.
AU  - Scarborough, Nelson L.
AU  - Carter, Andrew J.
AU  - Phillips, Frank M.
TI  - Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Applications and Future Trends
AID  - 10.14444/8059
DP  - 2021 Apr 01
TA  - International Journal of Spine Surgery
PG  - 113--119
VI  - 15
IP  - s1
4099  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/15/s1/113.short
4100  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/15/s1/113.full
SO  - Int J Spine Surg2021 Apr 01; 15
AB  - Background: Graft augmentation for spinal fusion is an area of continued interest, with a wide variety of available products lacking clear recommendations regarding appropriate use. While iliac crest autograft has long been considered the “gold standard”, suboptimal fusion rates along with harvest-related concerns continue to drive the need for graft alternatives. There are now multiple options of products with various characteristics that are available. These include demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and demineralized bone fibers (DBF), which have been used increasingly to promote spine fusion. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated narrative on the use of DBM/DBF in spine surgery.Methods: Literature review.Results: The clinical application of DBM in spine surgery has evolved since its introduction in the mid-1900s. Early preclinical studies demonstrated its effectiveness in promoting fusion. When used in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, more recent clinical data suggest similar rates of fusion compared with autograft, although clinical studies are primarily limited to level III or IV evidence with few level I studies. However, significant variability in surgical technique and type of product used in the literature limits its interpretation and overall application.Conclusions: DBM and DBF are bone graft options in spine surgery. Most commonly used as graft extenders, they have the ability to increase the volume of traditional grafting techniques while potentially inducing new bone formation. While the literature supports good fusion rates when used in the lumbar spine and when used with adjuvant cages or additional grafting techniques in the cervical spine, care should be taken when using as a stand-alone product. As new literature emerges, DBM and DBF can be a useful method in a surgeon's armamentarium for fusion-based procedures.