PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Stephan, Stephen R.
AU  - Kanim, Linda E.
AU  - Bae, Hyun W.
TI  - Stem Cells and Spinal Fusion
AID  - 10.14444/8057
DP  - 2021 Apr 01
TA  - International Journal of Spine Surgery
PG  - 94--103
VI  - 15
IP  - s1
4099  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/15/s1/94.short
4100  - https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/15/s1/94.full
SO  - Int J Spine Surg2021 Apr 01; 15
AB  - Background: This manuscript is a review of the literature investigating the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) being applied in the setting of spinal fusion surgery. We mention the rates of pseudarthrosis, discuss current bone grafting options, and examine the preclinical and clinical outcomes of utilizing MSCs to assist in successfully fusing the spine.Methods: A thorough literature review was conducted to look at current and previous preclinical and clinical studies using stem cells for spinal fusion augmentation. Searches for PubMed/MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov through January 2021 were conducted for literature mentioning stem cells and spinal fusion.Results: All preclinical and clinical studies investigating MSC use in spinal fusion were examined. We found 19 preclinical and 17 clinical studies. The majority of studies, both preclinical and clinical, were heterogeneous in design due to different osteoconductive scaffolds, cells, and techniques used. Preclinical studies showed promising outcomes in animal models when using appropriate osteoconductive scaffolds and factors for osteogenic differentiation. Similarly, clinical studies have promising outcomes but differ in their methodologies, surgical techniques, and materials used, making it difficult to adequately compare between the studies.Conclusion: MSCs may be a promising option to use to augment grafting for spinal fusion surgery. MSCs must be used with appropriate osteoconductive scaffolds. Cell-based allografts and the optimization of their use have yet to be fully elucidated. Further studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of MSCs with different osteoconductive scaffolds and growth/osteogenic differentiation factors.Level of Evidence: 3.