Table 2

Comparison of patients for whom indirect decompression was successful vs those who underwent subsequent reoperation for direct decompression

VariableIndirect Success
(n = 545)
Failed Indirect
(n = 23)
P Value
Mean age (years)49.856.6<0.025
Mean preop ODI43.846.5>0.50
Mean preop VAS back pain6.36.4>0.50
Mean preop VAS leg pain4.95.6>0.30
N (%) N (%)
Gender>0.05
 Female288 (95.7%)13 (4.3%)
 Male257 (96.3%)10 (3.7%)
Symptoms>0.05
 Radiculopathy489 (96.3%)19 (3.7%)
 Neurogenic claudication13 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)
 Both43 (91.4%)4 (8.5%)
Level operated> 0.05
 L2-31 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)
 L3-45 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)
 L4-5139 (97.2%)4 (2.8%)
 L5-S1400 (95.6%)19 (4.4%)
ODI Section 7a >0.05
 Score 0–2377 (95.9%)16 (4.1%)
 Score 3–5143 (95.3%)7 (4.7%)
Fusion technique>0.05
 Stand-alone ALIF235 (95.1%)12 (4.9%)
 ALIF + PI310 (96.7%)11 (3.4%)
  • aPreoperative ODI Section 7 response not available for 2 patients.

  • ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; PI, posterior instrumentation; VAS, visual analog scale.