Table 4

Bivariate analysis achievement for VAS leg.

CharacteristicFailed MCID (%)RR95% CI P valuea
Overall20.7%
Age
18–50 y 57.5% Reference
>50 y 42.5% 1.4 (1.1–1.8) 0.015
Gender
 Male72.0%1.1(0.8–1.5)0.530
 Female28.0%Reference
BMI
 <30 kg/m2 59.0%Reference
 ≥30 kg/m2 41.0%1.1(0.8–1.4)0.692
Smoking status
 Nonsmoker81.0%Reference
 Smoker19.0%1.2(0.8–1.6)0.369
Diabetes
 Nondiabetic92.9%Reference
 Diabetic7.1%1.3(0.75–2.1)0.389
Ageless CCI
<1 49.0% Reference
≥1 51.0% 1.5 (1.2–1.9) 0.005
ASA score
 <236.3%Reference
 ≥263.7%0.9(0.7–1.3)0.646
Insurance
 Non-WC64.9%Reference
 WC35.1%1.2(0.9–1.5)0.081
Operative length
 <50 min66.7%Reference
 ≥50 min33.3%0.9(0.9–1.0)0.051
EBL
<50 mL 91.1% Reference
≥50 mL 8.9% 1.9 (1.4–2.6) 0.001
Operative levels
Single 72.0% Reference
Multilevel 28.0% 1.7 (1.3–2.3) 0.001
Operative technique
 Laminectomy only28.1%1.6(1.2–2.0)0.001
 Discectomy only----
 Laminectomy + discectomy71.0%0.6(0.5–0.8)0.001
Spinal pathologies
HNP 69.1% 0.6 (0.5–0.9) 0.003
Central stenosis 70.2% 1.5 (1.1–2.0) 0.008
Foraminal stenosis 40.5% 1.3 (1.1–1.7) 0.042
  • Boldface indicates statistical significance.

  • aP value calculated using Poisson regression.

  • ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; EBL, estimated blood loss; HNP, herniated nucleus pulposus; RR, relative risk; VAS, visual analog scale; WC, workers’ compensation.