Table 2

Clinical score description.

FusionArthroplasty
DescriptionScoringDescriptionScoring
Indication Commonly performed in degenerative conditions such as: intervertebral disc disease degenerative scoliosis spinal canal stenosis20,21 Mentions one degenerative condition Indication Primary indication: isolated discogenic low back pain without instability in a skeletally mature patient, and no more than a grade I spondylolisthesis12,22 Broadened indications: patients with prior surgery, such as microdiscectomy, prior fusion with ASD, and disc replacement below a previous long-segment fusion for scoliosis23,24 Mentions the primary indication. May mention broadened indications but must not mention inappropriate indications
Sometimes performed in lumbar fusion is used for spondylolisthesis, traumatic conditions (fractures and dislocations), tumors (most commonly metastases)21 Mentions oneOther indications23,24 Mentions that other indications are unproven
Alternatives Nonoperative management21 Mentions at least two nonoperative options Alternatives Nonoperative management21 Same as fusion marking
Other operative management21 Mentions one other operative managementOperative management13,21,25 Mentions other operative managements (eg, fusion)
Procedure Approaches to the lumbar spine21 Mentions the existence of other approaches Procedure Approach21 Mentions anterior approach
Types of fusion26 Mentions the existence of other types of fusionImplant21,27 Describes the basic structure or function of any implant
Complications Major complications 28,29: mortality, neurological deficit, DVT/PE, vascular injury, stroke, deep wound infectionMentions four major complications, including mortality and neurological deficit Complications Major complications (see fusion)13,28,29 Same as fusion marking
Minor complications: 28,29 dural tear, misplaced screw causing radicular pain, UTI, superficial wound infection, postoperative anemia, ileus hematoma/seroma, pseudarthrosis, postoperative pain, adjacent segment diseaseMentions any 4 Minor complications (see fusion)13,28,29 Same as fusion marking
Outcomes Hospital stay: 2–6 d25 Mentions an accurate hospital stay Outcomes Hospital stay: 2–4 d25 Mentions appropriate hospital stay
Satisfaction rates: 21,30,31 "clinical success" 41%, satisfied—80 % unless on "workers comp" then closer to 50 %Mentions an accurate figure Satisfaction rates:21,27 53 % clinical success per FDA criteria for pro-disc L, otherwise as per fusion success ratesMentions appropriate satisfaction rates
Recovery: 32 4–6 wk to return to an office or sedentary job, 3 mo or longer to return to activities that are more physicalMentions accurate recovery times Recovery: around 3 mo33 Mentions appropriate recovery times, same as fusion accepted
  • Clinical score marking rubric. Marking criteria based on clinical evidence (references provided) and set at the standard expected for a patient’s informed consent.

  • ASD, adjacent segment disease; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; PE, pulmonary embolism; UTI, urinary tract infection.