Table 2

Comparison of fusion mass thickness, BMD, and screw length in 6 adult spinal deformity patients treated with FMS fixation during revision spine surgery.

CaseLevelFusion Mass Thickness (mm)Fusion Mass BMD (HU)Screw Length (mm)Complications Related to FMS PlacementFMS Loosening, Breakage, or Pseudarthrosis at Latest Follow-Up
1T1223.731540NoneNone
1L224.447535NoneNone
2T815.862840NoneNone
2T1013.354440NoneNone
3T98.657440NoneNone
3T1010.449635NoneNone
3T1112.837840NoneNone
4T1218.750035Spinal canal breachNone
4L119.437835NoneNone
5L211.145540NoneNone
5L513.937240NoneNone
6 T910.715630NoneNone
6T1014.328430NoneNone
6T1119.621525NoneNone
6T1216.518825NoneNone
Mean ± SD_15.5 ± 4.8397 ± 14435 ± 5.5__
  • Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density; CT, computed tomography; FMS, fusion mass screw; HU, Hounsfield units.

  • Note: There was no evidence of FMS loosening, breakage, or pseudarthrosis on CT at an mean of 2.2 years of follow-up (range: 1.4 to 3.1 years). On postoperative CT, 1 out of 15 screws had a low-grade breach (<2 mm) into the canal (Case 4 at T12). There were otherwise no complications related to FMS placement.