Table 3

Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool assessments of case series within the top 25 most-cited articles ordered by citation ranking.

JBI Assessment Categories2. Devito et al (2010)6. Lieberman et al (2006)7. Pechlivanis et al (2009)9. van Dijk et al (2015)11. Keric et al (2017)12. Barzilay et al (2006)14. Khan et al (2019)16. Schatlo et al (2015)23. Kuo et al (2016)24. Tian et al (2020)25. Wolf et al (2001)
Clear inclusion criteriaNoNoYesYesYesNoYesYesYesNoNo
Reliable data collectionNoYesNoYesYesNoYesYesYesNoNo
Valid methodology for assessing outcomesYesYesYesYesYesNoYesYesYesNoNo
Consecutive seriesYesNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoNo
Inclusion of all possible participants/casesNoNoYesNoYesYesYesYesYesNoYes
Relevant demographics reportedYesNoYesYesYesYesNoNoYesYesYes
Baseline clinical characteristics reportedNoNoNoNoYesYesNoNoYesNoNo
Clear description of outcomesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Study site/setting describedYesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoYesYesNo
Appropriate statistical analysisYesYesYesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYes
Total Score (/10)6477106871043