Table 4

Comparison of reoperations among single-level TLIFs with and without BMP use.

ReoperationNo BMPBMPTotal P
Return to OR 30 d2 (3.0%)3 (3.7%)5 (3.4%)0.810
Return to OR 90 d3 (4.5%)3 (3.7%)6 (4.1%)0.812
Return to OR to follow-up12 (17.9%)9 (11.1%)21 (14.2%)0.238
Levels Involved
 Reoperation at the same level as index surgery11 (16.4%)9 (9.9%)19 (12.8%)0.236
 Reoperation at the adjacent level of index surgery5 (7.5%)4 (4.9%)9 (6.1%)0.522
Reason for reoperation
 Any neurological symptom10 (14.9%)8 (9.9%)18 (12.2%)0.350
 Pseudarthrosis5 (7.5%)3 (3.7%)8 (5.4%)0.314
 Adjacent segment stenosis5 (7.5%)4 (4.9%)9 (6.1%)0.522
 Central or foraminal stenosis3 (4.5%)5 (6.2%)8 (5.4%)0.65
 Wound infection/complication0 (0.0%)1 (1.2%)1 (0.7%)0.361
 Instrumentation (migration/prominence/failure)0 (0.0%)1 (1.2%)1 (0.7%)0.361
 Hematoma/seroma0 (0.0%)1 (1.2%)1 (0.7%)0.361
Days to revision surgery400.3 ± 260.4394.6 ± 297.0398.0 ± 267.90.965
  • Abbreviations: BMP, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2; OR, operating room; TLIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

  • Note: Reoperations and reason for reoperation were recorded by clinical and operative notes at the study institution.