Table 4

Univariate and multivariable logistic regression predicting PJK. Multivariable regression model included age, body mass index, osteopenia/osteoporosis, postoperative sagittal vertical axis, postoperative pelvic incidence lumbar lordosis, UIV tilt angle, and UIV screw angle.

VariableUnivariateMultivariable
OR (95% CI)Wald-df P OR (95% CI)Wald-df P
Mechanical Complications
 UIV tilt angle0.99 (0.96–1.02)–0.760.6211.01 (0.97–1.05)–0.310.405
 UIV screw angle1.01 (0.96–1.06)–0.640.5451.06 (0.98–1.15)1.700.100
PJK
 UIV tilt angle1.00 (0.97–1.03)–0.850.6861.06 (1.01–1.12)4.420.020
 UIV screw angle1.07 (1.01–1.12)6.230.0071.19 (1.07–1.33)9.400.001
PJK
 UIV tilt angle1.00 (0.97–1.03)–0.970.8461.06 (1.01–1.12)2.860.049
 UIV screw angle1.07 (1.01–1.14)5.440.0111.14 (1.02–1.27)5.130.013
Rod Fracture/Pseudarthrosis
 UIV tilt angle0.98 (0.96–1.02)–0.330.4120.99 (0.95–1.03)–0.930.785
 UIV screw angle0.97 (0.93–1.02)–0.060.3340.95 (0.89–1.02)0.580.208
Implant Related
 UIV tilt angle1.00 (0.95–1.05)–0.990.9261.03 (0.95–1.12)–0.390.435
 UIV screw angle0.96 (0.88–1.06)–0.460.4660.97 (0.82–1.15)–0.910.768
Reoperations
 UIV tilt angle0.98 (0.96–1.01)–0.380.4301.00 (0.96–1.04)–0.950.831
 UIV screw angle0.99 (0.95–1.04)–0.990.9620.99 (0.92–1.06)–0.930.785
MCID NRS-Back
 UIV tilt angle0.98 (0.96–1.01)–0.500.4800.96 (0.92–1.01)1.130.144
 UIV screw angle1.04 (0.99–1.10)1.600.1061.08 (0.99–1.18)2.110.077
MCID NRS-Leg
 UIV tilt angle0.99 (0.96–1.03)–0.990.9590.99 (0.94–1.03)–0.820.671
 UIV screw angle1.02 (0.97–1.09)–0.080.3371.01 (0.92–1.10)–0.970.859
MCID Oswestry Disability Index
 UIV tilt angle1.00 (0.97–1.03)0.090.7531.01 (0.96–1.04)–1.000.961
 UIV screw angle1.02 (0.97–1.07)–0.240.3841.05 (0.96–1.14)0.450.228
  • Abbreviations: MCID, minimal clinically important difference; NRS, Numeric Rating Scale; PJK, proximal junctional kyphosis; UIV, upper instrumented vertebrae.

  • Note. UIV tilt angle and UIV screw angle were treated as continuous variables.