Table 2

Comparison of patient and surgical factors at the time of revision surgery.

VariablesNo R-PJF (N = 36)R-PJF (N = 24) Pa a
Patient factors at the revision surgery
 Age, y73.6 ± 6.970.5 ± 6.00.076
 Women31 (86.1%)20 (83.3%)0.768
 Femoral neck BMD (T-score)–1.4 ± 1.3–1.5 ± 1.30.704
 Osteoporosis7 (19.4%)6 (25.0%)0.609
 Osteoporosis treatmenta 0.906
 None20 (55.6%)15 (62.5%)
 Anabolic agents11 (30.6%)7 (29.1%)
 Antiresorptive agents5 (13.8%)2 (8.4%)
 Body mass index27.1 ± 3.826.3 ± 2.80.392
 ASA grade2.2 ± 0.42.3 ± 0.40.807
 Smoking5 (13.8%)2 (8.3%)0.330
 Hypertension23 (63.9%)18 (75.0%)0.410
 Diabetes mellitus13 (54.2%)11 (45.8%)0.592
Surgical factors at the revision surgery
 Time from index op to revision surgery (mo)22.7 ± 17.232.7 ± 22.30.226
 Failure modes causing revision surgery0.166
 Disc and ligamentous failure11 (30.6%)5 (20.8%)
 Bony failure19 (52.8%)18 (75.0%)
 Implant/bone interface failure6 (16.7%)1 (4.2%)
 Performance of laminectomy22 (61.1%)9 (37.5%)0.687
 No. of fusion levels extended4.0 ± 2.54.2 ± 2.70.840
 Final UIV level0.743
 T1–T45 (13.9%)3 (12.5%)
 T5–T812 (33.3%)6 (25.0%)
 T9–T1019 (52.8%)15 (62.5%)
 Hounsfield unit of UIV172.1 ± 57.1160.5 ± 44.80.202
 Hounsfield unit of UIV + 1186.6 ± 55.2167.0 ± 41.80.072
 Uppermost screw angle (°)b –0.5 ± 3.21.0 ± 2.6 0.037
 Hook fixation at UIV + 1 level11 (30.6%)5 (20.8%)0.404
 UIV cement12 (33.3%)2 (8.3%) 0.031
  • Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMD, bone mineral density; R-PJF, recurrent proximal junctional failure; UIV, uppermost instrumented vertebra.

  • Note: Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%). Bold P values indicate statistical significance.

  • a Anabolic agents include teriparatide, and antiresorptive agents include denosumab or bisphosphonate.

  • b Positive value represents the cranial inclination of the pedicle screw relative to the upper endplate.