Table 2

Radiographic information separated into pre- and postoperative alignment categories.

CharacteristicsDegrees, mean (SD; range)Significancea P < 0.005
Preserved n = 76 (56.3%)Restored n = 23 (17.0%)Not Corrected n = 29 (21.5%)Worsened n = 7 (5.2%)
Preoperative
 Lumbar lordosis55.0 (10.1; 30–76)45.1 (13.8; 21–73)44.7 (11.2; 26–62)50.3 (17.8; 24–77)<0.001
 Pelvic incidence54.0 (10.9; 36–83)61.4 (14.5; 41–88)64.7 (11.9; 42–83)53.3 (18.5; 33–85)<0.001
 Spinopelvic alignment (PI–LL)–1.0 (7.1; –18–10)16.3 (5.6; 10–30)20.0 (5.9; 11–32)3.0 (8.0; –13–9)<0.001
Postoperative
 Lumbar lordosis58.3 (11.1; 37–85)56.3 (13.5; 29–81)45.3 (12.2; 17–62)39.9 (16.7; 22–71)<0.001
 Pelvic incidence55.4 (10.9; 37–84)60.6 (14.7; 38–88)65.1 (11.3; 42–84)55.8 (16.0; 42–84)0.003
 Spinopelvic alignment (PI–LL)–2.9 (8.1; –29–9)4.3 (4.6; –9–10)19.8 (8.2; 10–42)15.9 (4.2; 12–23)<0.001
Change from baseline
 Lumbar lordosis3.3 (6.3; –10–22)11.2 (7.4; 2–32)0.5 (7.1; –21–21)–10.4 (7.8; –25 to –2)<0.001
 Pelvic incidence1.4 (2.9; –5–11)–0.8 (3.4; –10–4)0.4 (3.8; –5–11)2.5 (3.6; –1–10)0.017
 Spinopelvic alignment (PI–LL)–1.9 (6.5; –21–11)–12.0 (6.9; –30 to –2)–0.2 (7.0; –13–21)13.0 (8.2; 5–29)<0.001
  • Abbreviations: LL, indicates lumbar lordosis; PI, pelvic incidence; PI–LL, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis.

  • a One-way analysis of variance tests were used to categorize differences for each alignment measure between all 4 alignment groups.