Table 5

Results of the between-groups post-hoc comparisons of the change in pain outcomes after controlling for baseline scores in a multivariable mixed-effects regression model.

ComparisonEstimated Differencea 95% CI P
LowerUpper
Change in VAS back painb
 3 mo6 mo5.303.926.68<0.001c
 6 mo12 mo1.470.042.900.13
 3 mo12 mo6.775.368.18<0.001c
 <40 y40–65 y2.37−0.305.040.25
 40–65 y>65 y1.45−3.025.92>0.99
 <40 y>65 y0.92−3.975.80>0.99
 BrantiganSTALIF2.51−0.195.200.21
 STALIFAustralis3.010.255.770.10
 BrantiganAustralis5.512.848.19<0.001c
 Higher ALIFLower ALIF7.491.8313.140.010c
Change in VAS leg paina
 3 mo6 mo7.866.319.41<0.001c
 6 mo12 mo0.64−0.972.25>0.99
 3 mo12 mo8.506.9110.09<0.001c
 <40 y40–65 y4.361.926.800.001c
 40–65 y>65 y6.602.3310.870.007c
 <40 y>65 y10.966.3415.58<0.001c
 BrantiganSTALIF2.26−0.274.790.24
 STALIFAustralis1.89−0.664.440.44
 BrantiganAustralis4.151.636.680.004c
 Higher ALIFLower ALIF0.49−4.725.700.85
  • Abbreviations: ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; VAS, visual analog scale.

  • a The estimated difference is the more significant improvement experienced by the category in bold text for each pairwise comparison. None of the estimated differences between groups were clinically significant.

  • b The estimated mean improvement at 3 months postsurgery for a <40-year-old patient with mean baseline, Brantigan cage, and higher ALIF were 44.7 for back pain and 26.6 for leg pain.

  • c Statistically significant difference P < 0.05.