Summary features of endoscopic lumbar decompression.22,24,64,76–92
Procedure | Summary Features |
Endoscopic Microdiscectomy |
Indications
● Lumbar disc herniation resulting in neurological deficits and radiculopathy not responding to conservative management |
Contraindications
● Severe facet joint arthritis or active infection ● Severe central canal stenosis requiring extensive decompression than provided by microdiscectomy | |
Approaches
● Interlaminar or Transforaminal | |
Advantages
● Reduced soft tissue and bony trauma ● Smaller incision and improved visualization of the surgical site ● Shorter LOS in hospital and faster recovery | |
Disadvantages
● Steep learning curve ● Potential for limited access to complex herniations or multi-level diseases increasing risk of incomplete decompression | |
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomies (TELF) |
Indications
● Foraminal stenosis with nerve root compression ● Lateral recess stenosis caused by disc herniation |
Contraindications
● Necessity for more extensive decompression due to severe central canal stenosis ● Severe facet joint arthritis or active infection | |
Approaches
● Transforaminal | |
Advantages
● Improved visualization of neural structures along with smaller incisions resulting in reduced soft tissue trauma ● Enhanced preservation of structures around surgical site and improved postoperative spinal stability | |
Disadvantages
● Reduced access to central canal ● Challenging to achieve full decompression in severe cases of foraminal stenosis | |
Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) |
Indications
● Symptomatic disc herniation not responding to conservative management ● Lumbar spinal stenosis resulting in bilateral neural compression |
Contraindications
● Severe central canal stenosis requiring more invasive approaches to achieve adequate decompression ● Significant spinal instability such as vertebral fractures or severe spondylolisthesis ● Severe facet joint arthritis or active infection | |
Approaches
● Typically interlaminar | |
Advantages
● Preservation of contralateral structures due to unilateral approach for bilateral decompression ● Smaller incisions, reduced soft tissue trauma, quicker recovery, and shorter in hospital LOS | |
Disadvantages
● Steep learning curve ● Limited access to central canal |
Abbreviations: LOS, length of stay; TELF, transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomies; ULBD, unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.