Table 2

Incidence of postoperative wound infections: “Open” compared with MIS procedures

AuthorsNPredominant type of spine surgeryNo. of postoperative spine infectionsRatioIncidence of infection
Open spine procedures
 Spangfort14 10,104Lumbar laminectomies290290/10,1042.9%
 Smith et al.15 94,115Posterior spinal fusions2,2802,280/94,1152.4%
 Daubs et al.16 46Spinal deformity posterior instrumentation22/464.3%
MIS spine procedures
Perez-Cruet et al.17 150 Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) 0 0/150 0%
Schwender et al.18 49 MIS TLIF 0 0/49 0%
Selznick et al.19 43 MIS TLIF 0 0/43 0%
O'Toole et al.3 1,338 Mixed—78% simple decompressions, 20% instrumented arthrodesis 3 3/1,338 0.22%
Matched series (open + MIS)
 Rodgers and Michitsch12 144Instrumented posterior lumbar fusions66/1444.2%
 Rodgers et al.13 313 XLIF 0 0/313 0%
 Rovner et al.20 251Open TLIF99/2513.6%
 Rovner et al.20 196 MIS TLIF 0 0/196 0%
 Isaacs et al.21 29XLIF with open posterior instrumentation33/2910%
 Isaacs et al. 21 78 XLIF and XLIF with MIS posterior instrumentation 0 0/78 0%
 Smith et al.15 94,115Deep infections, all open cases1,4141,414/94,1151.5%
 Smith et al.15 35 Deep infections, all MIS cases 14,301 35/14,301 0.2%
  • Abbreviations: TLIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; XLIF, extreme lateral interbody fusion.