Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term reduction in pain and disability after surgery with the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) spinal stabilization system in patients with low back pain: 4-year follow-up from a longitudinal prospective case series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with low back pain (LBP) suffer chronic disability. In 40% of LBP patients degenerative disc disease (DDD) seems to be the cause. This prospective case series assessed the efficacy of the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM™) in patients with LBP resulting from DDD. All patients were initially assessed by physical examinations, magnetic resonance imaging, dynamic X-rays and provocative discography. Eligible patients (n = 52) had LBP for a minimum of 4 months, and received surgery with the DIAM™ system 2–4 weeks after diagnosis. Patients were evaluated pre-/post-operatively for pain severity using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and for dysfunction and disability with the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). VAS and RMDQ score changes were assessed using the appropriate contrasts and Bonferroni-corrected P values. As a result, significant (P < 0.0001) pain score reductions were observed between baseline values, and 2 (3.7, 95% CI 3.1; 4.2) and 48 (3.1, 95% CI 2.5; 3.6) months follow-up (intent-to-treat population). Disability scores were significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced between baseline and 2 (8.6, 95% CI 7.4; 9.9) and 48 (7.5, 95% CI 6.1; 8.9) months. Disability scores were similar from months 2 to 48. At 48 months, 67.3% of patients reached the minimum clinically important difference (MCID; ≥1.5-unit improvement) in VAS score and 78.9% of patients reached the MCID (≥30% improvement) in RMDQ score. No complications were associated with surgery. In conclusion, patients with LBP treated with the interspinous DIAM™ system showed significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pain and disability for up to 4 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams MA, Bogduk N, Burton K, Dolan P (2002) The biomechanics of back pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  2. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G (2006) European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15:S192–S300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burton AK, Balague F, Cardon G, Eriksen HR, Henrotin Y, Lahad A, Leclerc A, Muller G, van der Beek AJ (2006) European guidelines for prevention in low back pain. Eur Spine J 15:S136–S168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cabraja M, Abbushi A, Woiciechowsky C, Kroppenstedt S (2009) The short- and mid-term effect of dynamic interspinous distraction in the treatment of recurrent lumbar facet joint pain. Eur Spine J 18:1686–1694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlsson CA, Nachemson A (2000) Neurophysiology of back pain: current knowledge. In: Nachemson A, Jonsomm E (eds) Neck and back pain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 149–163

    Google Scholar 

  6. Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr, Schuler TC (2007) Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 7:541–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hermans V, De Beeck RO (2000) Research on work-related low back disorders. Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. http://ispesl.it/profili_di_rischio%5Csitopesca/pdf/lowback.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2011

  9. Hrabalek L, Machac J, Vaverka M (2009) The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 76:417–423

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jordan K, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Croft P (2006) A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol 59:45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim C, Mahar A, Perry A, Massie J, Lu L, Currier B, Yaszemski MJ (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable radiopaque polypropylene fumarate cement for kyphoplasty in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:604–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W (2007) One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability. J Korean Med Sci 22:330–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee J, Hida K, Seki T, Iwasaki Y, Minoru A (2004) An interspinous process distractor (X STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindsey DP, Swanson KE, Fuchs P, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF, Yerby SA (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2192–2197

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lutz C, Lutz GE, Cooke PM (2003) Treatment of chronic lumbar diskogenic pain with intradiskal electrothermal therapy: a prospective outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marks RC, Houston T, Thulbourne T (1992) Facet joint injection and facet nerve block: a randomised comparison in 86 patients with chronic low back pain. Pain 49:325–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Minns RJ, Walsh WK (1997) Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:1819–1825

    Google Scholar 

  18. Palmer KT, Walsh K, Bendall H, Cooper C, Coggon D (2000) Back pain in Britain: comparison of two prevalence surveys at an interval of 10 years. BMJ 320:1577–1578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8:141–144

  20. Schiavoen AM, Pasquale G (2003) The use of disc assisted prostheses (DIAM) in degenerative lumbar pathology: indications, techniques and results. Ital J Spinal Disord 3:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N (1994) Clinical features of patients with pain stemming from the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Is the lumbar facet syndrome a clinical entity? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:1132–1137

  22. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N (1994) The false-positive rate of uncontrolled diagnostic blocks of the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Pain 58:195–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sengupta DK (2004) Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 35:43–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Siddiqui M, Smith FW, Wardlaw D (2007) One-year results of X Stop interspinous implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1345–1348

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor J, Pupin P, Delajoux S, Palmer S (2007) Device for intervertebral assisted motion: technique and initial results. Neurosurg Focus 22:E6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor RS, Fritzell P, Taylor RJ (2007) Balloon kyphoplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 16:1085–1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Haselkorn J, Kent D, Ciol MA, Deyo R (1992) Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. JAMA 268:907–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Turner JA, Herron L, Deyo RA (1993) Meta-analysis of the results of lumbar spine fusion. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 251:120–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Tulder MW, Goossens M, Waddell G, Nachemson A (2000) Conservative treatment of chronic low back pain. In: Nachemson AL, Jonssom E (eds) Neck and back pain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 271–304

    Google Scholar 

  30. Van Tulder MW, Waddell G (2000) Conservative treatment of acute and subacute low back pain. In: Nachemson AL, Jonssom E (eds) Neck and back pain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 241–270

    Google Scholar 

  31. Waddell G, Gibson JNA, Grant I (2000) Surgical treatment of lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar disc disease. In: Nachemson AL, Jonssom E (eds) Neck and back pain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 305–325

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ, Johnson DR, Skidmore GA, Vessa PP, Dwyer JW, Puccio S, Cauthen JC, Ozuna RM (2004) A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 13:22–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All statistical analyses of the data were carried out by Medtronic. The authors would like to thank Karen Munro and Richard Barry (Quintiles Medical Communications) for medical writing assistance, which was funded by Medtronic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josip Buric.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buric, J., Pulidori, M. Long-term reduction in pain and disability after surgery with the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) spinal stabilization system in patients with low back pain: 4-year follow-up from a longitudinal prospective case series. Eur Spine J 20, 1304–1311 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1697-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1697-6

Keywords

Navigation