Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The percutaneous stabilisation of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: a prospective outcome study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The use of percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation as a treatment of sacroiliac joint pain has been reported to be successful. This study was a prospective single surgeon series to evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous sacroiliac joint stabilisation.

Methods

Between July 2004 and February 2011, 73 patients underwent percutaneous sacroiliac joint fusion in our unit. All patients completed a short form (SF)-36 questionnaire, visual analogue pain score and Majeed scoring questionnaire prior to treatment and at last follow-up.

Results

55 patients (9 male and 46 female) completed follow-up. The average follow-up period was for 36.18 months (range 12–84). The mean preoperative SF-36 scores were 26.59 for physical health and 40.38 for mental health. The mean postoperative SF-36 scores were 42.93 for physical health and 52.77 for mental health. The mean visual analogue pain scores were 8.1 preoperative and 4.5 postoperative. The mean pelvic specific scoring were 36.9 preoperative and 64.78 postoperative. We noted that patients who had previous instrumented spinal surgery did significantly worse than those who had not. We had two nerve root-related complications.

Conclusion

We conclude that in selected patient group who respond positively to CT-guided injection, a percutaneous SI joint stabilisation is beneficial in effecting pain relief and functional improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wise CL, Dall BE (2008) Minimally invasive sacroiliac arthrodesis: outcomes of a new technique. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(8):579–584. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31815ecc4b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith-Peterson MN (1921) Arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint. A new method of approach. J Orthop Surg 3:400–405

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shuler TE, Boone DC, Gruen GS, Peitzman AB (1995) Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation: early treatment for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. J Trauma 38(3):453–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Khurana A, Guha AR, Mohanty K, Ahuja S (2009) Percutaneous fusion of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: clinical and radiological outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(5):627–631. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21519

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Khayer A, Hegarty J, Hahn D, Grevitt MP (2008) Percutaneous sacroiliac joint arthrodesis: a novel technique. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(5):359–363. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318145ab96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Majeed SA (1989) Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71(2):304–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen HC, McKenzie-Brown AM, Cohen SP, Swicegood JR, Colson JD, Manchikanti L (2007) Sacroiliac joint interventions: a systematic review. Pain Physician 10(1):165–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J (2000) Evaluation of clinical tests used in classification procedures in pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. Eur Spine J 9(2):161–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaenslen FJ (1927) Sacroiliac arthrodesis: indications, author’s technique and end-results. J Am Med Assoc 89:2031–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson HS, Brox JI, Robinson R, Bjelland E, Solem S, Telje T (2007) The reliability of selected motion- and pain provocation tests for the sacroiliac joint. Man Ther 12(1):72–79. doi:10.1016/j.math.2005.09.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Simopoulos TT, Manchikanti L, Singh V, Gupta S, Hameed H, Diwan S, Cohen SP (2012) A systematic evaluation of prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of sacroiliac joint interventions. Pain Physician 15(3):E305–E344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johansson HR, Bergschmidt P, Skripitz R, Finze S, Bader R, Mittelmeier W (2010) Impact of preoperative function on early postoperative outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 18(1):6–10

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baumann C, Rat AC, Osnowycz G, Mainard D, Cuny C, Guillemin F (2009) Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:150. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brennan P, Silman A (1995) Why the gender difference in susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 54(9):694–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DePalma MJ, Ketchum JM, Saullo TR (2012) Multivariable analyses of the relationships between age, gender, and body mass index and the source of chronic low back pain. Pain Med 13(4):498–506. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01339.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weil YA, Nousiainen MT, Helfet DL (2007) Removal of an iliosacral screw entrapping the L5 nerve root after failed posterior pelvic ring fixation: a case report. J Orthop Trauma 21(6):414–417. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3180cab6b5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tonetti J, Cazal C, Eid A, Badulescu A, Martinez T, Vouaillat H, Merloz P (2004) Neurological damage in pelvic injuries: a continuous prospective series of 50 pelvic injuries treated with an iliosacral lag screw. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90(2):122–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marmor M, Lynch T, Matityahu A (2010) Superior gluteal artery injury during iliosacral screw placement due to aberrant anatomy. Orthopedics 33(2):117–120. doi:10.3928/01477447-20100104-26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Buchowski JM, Kebaish KM, Sinkov V, Cohen DB, Sieber AN, Kostuik JP (2005) Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint. Spine J 5(5):520–528. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.02.022 (discussion 529)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz V, Schofferman J, Reynolds J (2003) The sacroiliac joint: a potential cause of pain after lumbar fusion to the sacrum. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(1):96–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maigne JY, Planchon CA (2005) Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks. Eur Spine J 14(7):654–658. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0692-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gates GF, McDonald RJ (1999) Bone SPECT of the back after lumbar surgery. Clin Nucl Med 24(6):395–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ivanov AA, Kiapour A, Ebraheim NA, Goel V (2009) Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study. Spine 34(5):E162–E169. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181978ea3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cinotti G, Roysam GS, Eisenstein SM, Postacchini F (1998) Ipsilateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation. A prospective, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(5):825–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Teixeira MJ, Yeng LT, Garcia OG, Fonoff ET, Paiva WS, Araujo JO (2011) Failed back surgery pain syndrome: therapeutic approach descriptive study in 56 patients. Rev Assoc Med Bras 57(3):282–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bokov A, Isrelov A, Skorodumov A, Aleynik A, Simonov A, Mlyavykh S (2011) An analysis of reasons for failed back surgery syndrome and partial results after different types of surgical lumbar nerve root decompression. Pain Physician 14(6):545–557

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saal JS (2002) General principles of diagnostic testing as related to painful lumbar spine disorders: a critical appraisal of current diagnostic techniques. Spine 27(22):2538–2545. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000032127.87893.17 (discussion 2546)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schutz U, Grob D (2006) Poor outcome following bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion for degenerative sacroiliac joint syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg 72(3):296–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lyndon W. Mason.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason, L.W., Chopra, I. & Mohanty, K. The percutaneous stabilisation of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: a prospective outcome study. Eur Spine J 22, 2325–2331 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2825-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2825-2

Keywords

Navigation