[Dynamic instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Clinical and biomechanical analysis of success factors]

Orthopade. 2011 Aug;40(8):703-12. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1800-z.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Total disc replacement and posterior dynamic stabilization represent alternatives to lumbar spinal fusion which should reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Disc replacement is indicated for pure discopathy without facet joint degeneration. Spinopelvic balance influences the implant's biomechanics. Therefore pelvic incidence, sacral slope, segmental lordosis and the mean axis of rotation need to be considered. Dynamic stabilization is indicated in moderate discopathy and facet joint degeneration, in degenerative spondylolisthesis grade I with a hypermobile segment and in dynamic lumbar stenosis. The combination of caudal fusion and cranial dynamic stabilization allows a better maintenance of lordosis with multiple level instrumentation and prevents adjacent segment degeneration. If pelvic incidence and sacral slope are high, L5-S1 should be fused because of elevated shear forces.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomechanical Phenomena / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Intervertebral Disc / physiopathology*
  • Intervertebral Disc / surgery*
  • Intervertebral Disc Degeneration / physiopathology*
  • Intervertebral Disc Degeneration / prevention & control*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / physiopathology*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Postoperative Complications / physiopathology*
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control*
  • Postural Balance / physiology
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Fitting
  • Spinal Fusion / methods*
  • Total Disc Replacement / methods*