Risk factors for failing to reach a minimal clinically important difference following minimally invasive lumbar decompression

EDK Cha, CP Lynch, CE Geoghegan… - International Journal of …, 2022 - ijssurgery.com
Background Clinically important postoperative changes can be best evaluated through the
minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Our study aims to evaluate risk factors …

Classification and prognostic factors of residual symptoms after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis: a 5-year follow-up cohort …

H Toyoda, K Yamada, H Terai, M Hoshino… - European Spine …, 2021 - Springer
Purpose Residual symptoms indicating incomplete remission of lower leg numbness or low
back pain may occur after spine surgery. The purpose was to elucidate the pattern of …

Improvements in back and leg pain after minimally invasive lumbar decompression

DH Massel, BC Mayo, DV Patel, DD Bohl… - HSS Journal …, 2020 - journals.sagepub.com
Background Few studies have quantified clinical improvement following minimally invasive
lumbar decompression based on predominant back pain or leg pain. Purpose To quantify …

Preoperative patient activation is predictive of improvements in patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression

NW Jenkins, JM Parrish, S Mohan… - European Spine …, 2020 - Springer
Purpose To determine whether there is an association between preoperative 10-Item Patient
Activation Measure (PAM-10) scores and clinical outcomes following MIS LD. Methods …

Minimally invasive lumbar decompression—the surgical learning curve

J Ahn, A Iqbal, BT Manning, S Leblang, DD Bohl… - The Spine Journal, 2016 - Elsevier
Abstract Background Context Minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) procedures carry an
inherently difficult learning curve based upon anecdotal evidence. Few studies have …

The influence of presenting physical function on postoperative patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression

KC Jacob, MR Patel, GA Park, JR Gheewala… - Clinical Spine …, 2023 - journals.lww.com
Study Design: The study of retrospective cohort. Objective: The aim was to compare patient-
reported outcome measures (PROMs), satisfaction, and minimum clinically important …

Meeting patient expectations and achieving a minimal clinically important difference for back disability, back pain, and leg pain may provide predictive utility for …

KC Jacob, MR Patel, AP Collins, GJ Park, NN Vanjani… - World Neurosurgery, 2022 - Elsevier
Objective Our study evaluates minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement
for back pain/leg pain/disability and meeting preoperative expectations as predictors of …

Time to achievement of minimum clinically important difference after lumbar decompression

JW Nie, VP Federico, TJ Hartman, E Zheng… - Acta …, 2023 - Springer
Objective The objective of this study is to examine factors associated with delayed time to
achieve minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in patients undergoing lumbar …

Poor muscle health and low preoperative ODI are independent predictors for slower achievement of MCID after minimally invasive decompression

S Singh, P Shahi, T Asada, A Kaidi, T Subramanian… - The Spine Journal, 2023 - Elsevier
ABSTRACT Background Context Although some previous studies have analyzed predictors
of nonimprovement, most of these have focused on demographic and clinical variables and …

The influence of sex on clinical outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar decompression

MT Nolte, NW Jenkins, JM Parrish, S Mohan… - International Journal of …, 2021 - ijssurgery.com
Background: Research focused on postoperative outcomes among men and women
undergoing minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS LD) spine surgery is sparse …