Comparative radiographic analyses and clinical outcomes between O-arm navigated and fluoroscopic-guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody …

W Singhatanadgige, P Pholprajug… - International Journal of …, 2022 - ijssurgery.com
Background The differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between 3-dimensional
computer navigation (NAV) and fluoroscopic-guided (FLUO) minimally invasive …

Screw placement accuracy for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a study on 3-D neuronavigation-guided surgery

J Torres, AR James, M Alimi, AJ Tsiouris… - Global spine …, 2012 - journals.sagepub.com
Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the impact of 3-D navigation for pedicle screw
placement accuracy in minimally invasive transverse lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) …

Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease

Q Zhang, XG Han, YF Xu, YJ Liu, B Liu, D He… - World Neurosurgery, 2019 - Elsevier
Objective To compare the clinical accuracy and perioperative outcomes for pedicle screw
placement in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) between the robot-assisted (RA) …

An outcome and cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using intraoperative fluoroscopy versus computed …

R Khanna, JL McDevitt, ZA Abecassis, ZA Smith… - World neurosurgery, 2016 - Elsevier
Background Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has
undergone significant evolution since its conception as a fusion technique to treat lumbar …

Comparison of radiation exposure between O-arm navigated and C-arm guided screw placement in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

CC Chang, HK Chang, JC Wu, TH Tu, H Cheng… - World Neurosurgery, 2020 - Elsevier
Background Instrumentation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
(MIS-TLIF) is highly dependent on image guidance. Guidance with fluoroscopy (C-arm) and …

[HTML][HTML] Narrative review of intraoperative image guidance for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

JA Weiner, MH McCarthy, P Swiatek… - Annals of …, 2021 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Recent advancements in imaging technology have changed the landscape of transforaminal
lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with the objective of improving safety and efficacy for the …

Perioperative comparison of robotic-assisted versus fluoroscopically guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

G De Biase, K Gassie, D Garcia, K Abode-Iyamah… - World Neurosurgery, 2021 - Elsevier
Objective Robotic surgical systems have been developed to improve spine surgery
accuracy. Studies have found significant reductions in screw revision rates and radiation …

[HTML][HTML] Marker Screw Utilization for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MS-MIS TLIF): Promises and Advantages

M Khashab, M Karami, M Alswat, M Elkhalifa - Medicina, 2023 - mdpi.com
Background and Objective: Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
(MIS-TLIF) has been investigated and shown excellent short-and long-term outcomes. In this …

Robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-institution, observational, case-control study

MC Lin, HW Liu, YK Su, WL Lo, CM Lin - Neurosurgical Focus, 2022 - thejns.org
OBJECTIVE The use of robotics in spinal surgery has gained popularity because of its
promising accuracy and safety. ROSA is a commonly used surgical robot system for spinal …

Effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: a systematic review and …

X Wang, H Liu, Y Ma, Q Zhu, Y Zhu - Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2024 - Springer
Robot-assisted (RA) technology has been widely used in spine surgery. This analysis aimed
to compare the effectiveness and safety of RA minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar …