Research ArticleMinimally Invasive Surgery

Patient-Reported Allergies Do Not Affect Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Spine Surgery

Patawut Bovonratwet, Avani S. Vaishnav, Jung Kee Mok, Zamie Abdullah, Mahie Abdullah, Evan D. Sheha, Steven J. McAnany, Catherine H. Gang and Sheeraz A. Qureshi
International Journal of Spine Surgery March 2023, 8420; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8420

Abstract

Background A gap in the literature exists regarding the association between number of allergies and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) for patients undergoing spine surgery.

Methods Consecutive cervical or lumbar spine surgery patients were identified from a prospective registry from April 2017 to July 2020. Patients were grouped into those with 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 allergies. Demographics were compared between the groups. PROMs included Neck Disability Index, Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain, VAS arm pain, VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, short form 12 (SF-12) physical component score, SF-12 mental component score, and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF), and outcomes were compared between the groups through multivariable analysis at up to 1-year follow-up. Associations between number of allergies and achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the 9 aforementioned PROMs at 1-year follow-up were assessed.

Results This study included 148 cervical and 517 lumbar patients. After controlling for demographic differences, a higher number of allergies was associated with less improvement in VAS neck pain, SF-12 physical component score, and PROMIS-PF at 12 weeks following cervical surgery and less improvement in PROMIS-PF at 2 weeks following lumbar surgery (P < 0.05). However, these associations failed to persist after 6 months and 12 weeks following surgery in cervical and lumbar patients, respectively (P > 0.05). No association was identified between number of allergies and achievement of MCID in any of the 9 studied PROMs at 1-year follow-up.

Conclusions The higher number of allergies was associated with less improvement in PROMs in the early postoperative period but not at longer-term follow-up.

Clinical Relevance These findings provide data that can be utilized while counseling patients and setting postoperative expectations.

Level of Evidence 3.

INTRODUCTION

There has been recent interest in studying the association between patient-reported allergies and postoperative outcomes.1 Various orthopedic subspecialties, such as total joint arthroplasty, have evaluated this association and have shown that patients with multiple reported allergies have less improvement in postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with patients with fewer allergies.2 With a recent shift in orthopedic surgery from fee-for-service to value-based care, it is important to understand these associations as poorer outcomes can now be translated to decreased reimbursement.3 This is especially important to consider when poorer outcomes may be due to patient preoperative nonmodifiable factors.

When looking specifically at the effects of the number of patient-reported allergies on postoperative PROMs in the field of spinal surgery, data in the literature have been limited and mixed.1,4 A few published abstracts, without associated full-text articles, have shown an association between increasing number of allergies and less improvement in postoperative PROMs such as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and short form 12 (SF-12) at up to 1-year follow-up.5,6 However, a recent full-text article demonstrated that a greater number of allergies may actually be associated with improved short-term postoperative pain and disability burden while having no effect on these outcomes at 1-year follow-up.4

Due to this lack of comprehensive data in the literature, the purposes of the current study were to determine the effects of the number of patient-reported allergies on postoperative PROMs and on achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at 1 year after cervical or lumbar spine surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design and Population

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a surgical database from April 2017 to July 2020 was performed. A fellowship-trained attending spine surgeon performed all procedures, and the first assist was a spine fellow for more than 85% of cases; in the remaining cases, it was an orthopedic surgery resident.

Consecutive patients who underwent cervical spine surgery or lumbar spine surgery from April 2017 to July 2020 were selected. Details of the surgical techniques have been extensively described in previous articles and book chapters.7–10 Each patient’s preoperative diagnosis was characterized. All revision cases were excluded. A total of 148 cervical spine surgery and 517 lumbar spine patients were identified. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study.

Data Collection

Data were collected and managed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)11,12 hosted at Weill Cornell Medicine Clinical and Translational Science Center, supported by the following grant: CTSC GRANT UL1 TR002384. REDCap is a secure, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 compliant web-based software platform designed to support data capture for research studies. Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative diagnosis, procedure type, and PROMs were obtained from review of electronic medical records and REDCap. In addition, the total number of allergies for each patient was collected from medical records, and patients were categorized to those with 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 allergies. The total number of allergies for each patient was also subcategorized into medical or environment/food/other allergies.

Demographics and comorbidities data included age, gender, body mass index, insurance type, preoperative narcotic use, current smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification, percentage neck pain, percentage back pain, percentage radiculopathy, preoperative depression, preoperative anxiety, and preoperative affective disorder.

Last, PROMs were recorded preoperatively and at 2-week, 12-week, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up visits. Assessments exclusively for cervical spine surgery patients included the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain, and VAS arm pain. Assessments exclusively for lumbar spine surgery patients included the ODI, VAS back pain, and VAS leg pain. Assessments for all patients included the SF12 physical component score (PCS), SF12 mental component score (MCS), and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF). These PROMs have all been validated for use in this patient population.13,14

Statistical Methods

Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative diagnosis, procedure, and preoperative PROMs were summarized using descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were summarized as frequency (percentage) while continuous variables were summarized as mean ± SD. In addition, these variables were also compared between those with 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 total allergies using Fisher’s exact test, Pearson’s χ 2 test, or analysis of variance, where appropriate.

Multivariable linear regressions were used to evaluate the association between increasing number of total allergies and each of the 9 studied PROMs at 2-week, 12-week, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up. For each of these regressions, pertinent covariates were included to adjust for confounding and to minimize bias. For example, for cervical spine surgery patients, gender, CCI, ASA, and preoperative PROMIS-PF were found to be statistically different between those with 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 allergies, and these variables were controlled for in the multivariable linear regressions. For lumbar spine surgery patients, gender, CCI, ASA, and preoperative depression were found to be statistically different between those with 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 allergies, and these variables were controlled for in the multivariable linear regressions. The decision to utilize multivariable linear regressions was based on a previous similar study.4

To further characterize the clinical significance of changes as measured on these PROMs, the MCID was determined for each instrument. MCID for cervical spine patients was calculated for NDI, VAS neck pain, VAS arm pain, SF12-PCS, SF12-MCS, and PROMIS-PF. MCID for lumbar spine patients was calculated for ODI, VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, SF12-PCS, SF12-MCS, and PROMIS-PF. The distribution-based method, as previously described in the literature, was used in this study.15 Briefly, the threshold for achieving the MCID for each instrument was determined by calculating the change in outcome equal to 0.5 SD over a 1-year period. We considered any patient who met this threshold at 1-year follow-up to have reached the MCID.

Multivariable Poisson regressions with robust error variance were used to determine the association between number of allergies and achieving MCID in each PROM at 1-year follow-up. For cervical spine surgery patients, gender, CCI, ASA, and preoperative PROMIS-PF were found to be statistically different between those with 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 allergies, and these variables were again controlled for in the multivariable Poisson regressions. For lumbar spine surgery patients, gender, CCI, ASA, and preoperative depression were found to be statistically different between those with 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 allergies, and these variables were again controlled for in the multivariable Poisson regressions.

Statistical significance was set as P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 13 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Patient Population

A total of 148 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery and 517 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery were identified for analysis based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Details of patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative diagnosis, procedure type, and preoperative PROMs for each cohort can be found in Tables 1 and 2.

View this table:
Table 1

Characteristics of cervical spine surgery patients (N = 148).

View this table:
Table 2

Characteristics of lumbar spine surgery patients (N = 517).

For cervical spine surgery patients, 86 (58%) had 0 allergies, 25 (17%) had 1 allergy, 15 (10%) had 2 allergies, and 22 (15%) had ≥3 allergies. For lumbar spine surgery patients, 266 (52%) had 0 allergies, 129 (25%) had 1 allergy, 48 (9%) had 2 allergies, and 74 (14%) had ≥3 allergies. Further subcategorization of total allergies into total medical allergies or total environment/food/other allergies is shown in Table 3.

View this table:
Table 3

Prevalence of preoperative allergies.

Association Between Number of Total Allergies and Postoperative PROMs

For cervical spine patients, after controlling for any preoperative characteristic differences, an increasing number of allergies was associated with decreased improvement in VAS neck pain (β coefficient = 0.41, P = 0.009) and VAS arm pain (β coefficient = 0.39, P = 0.015) at 2-week follow-up. In addition, increasing number of allergies was associated with decreased improvement in VAS neck pain (β coefficient = 0.34, P = 0.009), SF-12 PCS (β coefficient = −1.84, P = 0.004), and PROMIS-PF (β coefficient = −1.41, P = 0.021) at 12-week follow-up (Table 4). There were no other significant associations between increasing number of allergies and postoperative PROMs at and after 6-months follow-up.

View this table:
Table 4

Multivariable analysis of association between number of total allergies and patient-reported outcome measures in cervical spine surgery.

For lumbar spine patients, after controlling for any preoperative characteristic differences, increasing number of allergies was associated with decreased improvement in PROMIS-PF (β coefficient = −0.78, P = 0.002) at 2-week follow-up (Table 5). There were no other significant associations between increasing number of allergies and postoperative PROMs at and after 12-week follow-up.

View this table:
Table 5

Multivariable analysis of association between number of total allergies and patient-reported outcome measures in lumbar spine surgery.

Association Between Number of Total Allergies and Achieving MCID at 1 Year

For cervical spine patients, after controlling for any preoperative characteristic differences, there were no associations between total number of allergies and achieving MCID in any of the studied PROMs at 1-year follow-up (Table 6). These PROMs included NDI, VAS neck pain, VAS arm pain, SF12-PCS, SF12-MCS, and PROMIS-PF.

View this table:
Table 6

Multivariable analysis of association between number of total allergies and achieving minimal clinically important difference at 1 y in cervical spine surgery.

Similarly, for lumbar spine patients, after controlling for any preoperative characteristic differences, there were no associations between total number of allergies and achieving MCID in any of the studied PROMs at 1-year follow-up (Table 7). These PROMs included ODI, VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, SF12-PCS, SF12-MCS, and PROMIS-PF.

View this table:
Table 7

Multivariable analysis of association between number of total allergies and achieving minimal clinically important difference at 1 y in lumbar spine surgery.

DISCUSSION

Recently, there has been a growing interest in the relationship between patient-reported allergies and clinical outcomes after elective orthopedic surgery.1,4,16–19 In spine surgery specifically, studies have shown varying levels of association between the number of allergies and PROMs.1,4,19 The current study analyzed the relationship between the number of patient-reported allergies and postoperative PROMs after elective cervical and lumbar surgery. The current study found that, while controlling for other variables, the number of patient-reported allergies was associated with less improvement in PROMs in the early postoperative period for both cervical and lumbar spine patients. However, these associations failed to persist at and after 6 months and 12 weeks following surgery in cervical and lumbar patients, respectively. Furthermore, no significant association was seen between the number of allergies and achievement of MCID in any PROMs 1 year after surgery.

Previous studies have analyzed the impact of patient-reported allergies on postoperative outcomes after orthopedic surgery.1,4,16–19 In a retrospective review, analyzing total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty patients, McLawhorn et al found that a greater number of patient-reported allergies were significantly associated with worse postoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores in both cohorts and longer length of hospitalization in the total knee arthroplasty cohort.17 In regard to how patient-reported allergies contribute to postoperative pain medication usage, Coxe et al reported a significant positive relationship between the number of patient-reported allergies and postoperative opioid consumption in ambulatory hand surgery patients.18

Specifically in spine surgery, recent studies have also investigated this relationship between patient-reported allergies and PROMs. In the preoperative setting, Lyons et al found a significant negative association between the number of patient-reported allergies and various preoperative PROMs, including ODI, NDI, PROMIS physical health, and PROMIS mental health.1 In the postoperative time period, the literature has shown mixed results and lacks data on a variety of PROMs.5 Levin et al studied 421 patients and showed that patient-reported allergies were associated with lower patient satisfaction scores, as measured with the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, after lumbar spine surgery.19 Xiong et al interestingly reported a significant association between the number of patient-reported allergies and subjective improvement in postoperative pain and disability burden as measured by the pain disability questionnaire in the early postoperative period after cervical and lumbar spine surgery.4 This association failed to persist 1 year after surgery. However, both of these published studies failed to evaluate any association between increasing number of allergies and validated postoperative PROMs such as NDI, ODI, VAS pain, SF-12, and PROMIS.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the impact of patient-reported allergies on an extensive list of postoperative validated PROMs in both cervical and lumbar spine surgery. The results of this study demonstrated some similarities with those of previous studies that analyzed the impact of allergies in spine surgery. For example, Xiong et al found no significant association between the number of allergies and clinical outcomes at 1 year postoperatively.4 However, the results of this study also differed with previous studies in several aspects. For example, Xiong et al found a significant association between the number of patient-reported allergies and subjective improvement in pain and disability burden in the early postoperative period.4 In contrast, this study found that the number of patient-reported allergies was significantly associated with worse PROMs in the early postoperative period. Combined, the results of this study can be used for effective patient counseling: Although allergies may lead to potentially worse outcomes in the short term following surgery, they do not impact long-term outcomes or the ability to achieve meaningful clinical improvement 1 year following surgery.

Many explanations regarding the impact of allergies on postoperative outcomes have been proposed in prior studies. A notable theory is that the relationship among preoperative mental health, patient-reported allergies, and postoperative outcomes may play a role. It has been well established in the literature that preoperative psychiatric conditions such as depression and anxiety may negatively impact outcomes after spine surgery.20,21 Furthermore, numerous studies have reported a significant association between preoperative depression/anxiety and the number of patient-reported allergies.6,19 Therefore, it can be reasoned that patients with greater allergy burden may also exhibit greater comorbid psychiatric burden, which may be contributing to worse outcomes. However, the current study has already controlled for various preoperative variables that were significantly different among the population, including preoperative depression in lumbar spine patients. Hence, it can be suggested that the number of patient-reported allergies may be an independent predictor for short-term outcomes after spine surgery, irrespective of factors such as preoperative mental health.

The current study had inherent limitations. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, which potentially introduces selection bias to the study. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon at an academic institution, thus limiting the external validity of the results to other populations. All allergies were self-reported on clinical intake forms, signifying that some patients may not have had a proper clinical diagnosis. Thus, the study’s reported prevalence of allergies may not reflect the true prevalence within this sample population. Furthermore, patients with allergies can present with a wide range of clinical manifestations, and it may be possible that the severity and type of reaction to allergies may influence postoperative outcomes. This study had no reliable source of information regarding these potential differences in clinical presentation. Therefore, future studies may need to further stratify based on more granular information. In addition, due to the retrospective nature of the current study as well as limited sample size, there is potential for Type II error.

CONCLUSION

The present retrospective study analyzed the association between the number of patient-reported allergies and postoperative patient-reported outcomes after cervical and lumbar spine surgery. In the early postoperative period, a greater number of allergies were associated with less improvement in various outcome measures. This association, however, did not persist after 6 months in either surgical population. The number of patient-reported allergies had no significant impact on achieving clinically meaningful improvement in any outcome measure at 1 year following surgery. These findings can be used to counsel patients with self-reported allergiesregarding expectations on postoperative outcomes.

Footnotes

  • Funding This study used REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) hosted at Weill Cornell Medicine Clinical and Translational Science Center and supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science of the National Institute of Health under award number UL1 TR002384.

  • Declaration of Conflicting Interests The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

  • Disclosures Steven McAnany reports consulting fees from Medtronic and Zimmer Biomet. Sheeraz Qureshi reports royalties/licenses from Stryker K2M and Globus Medical; consulting fees from Viseon Inc, Stryker K2M, SpineGuard, Globus Medical, and Surgalign; payment/honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or education events from AMOpportunities; stock/stock options from Tissue Differentiation Intelligence and HS2, LLC; clinical events committees for Simplify Medical, LifeLink.com, and Spinal Simplicity; and research support from Viseon, Inc. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

  • Ethical Review Committee Statement Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study.

References

  1. 1.↵
    2. Lyons KW ,
    3. Borsinger TM ,
    4. Lucas AP ,
    5. McGuire KJ ,
    6. Pearson AM ,
    7. Abdu WA
    . Patient-reported allergies, a marker of preoperative pain and disability in elective spine surgery. Global Spine J. 2020;10(5):592–597. doi:10.1177/2192568219865188
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    2. Otero JE ,
    3. Graves CM ,
    4. Gao Y , et al
    . Patient-reported allergies predict worse outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(12):2746–2749. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.040
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    2. Attarian DE ,
    3. Seyler TM ,
    4. Bolognesi MP
    . Overview: value-based care for orthopedic surgery. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2020;35(1):3–6. doi:10.1097/BTO.0000000000000415
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    2. Xiong DD ,
    3. Ye W ,
    4. Xiao R , et al
    . Patient-reported allergies predict postoperative outcomes and psychosomatic markers after spine surgery. Spine J. 2019;19(1):121–130. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.032
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    2. Graves C ,
    3. Carreon LY ,
    4. Gvozdyev B ,
    5. Riley S ,
    6. Gum JL ,
    7. Glassman SD
    . Multiple patient reported allergies are associated with worse outcomes following lumbar spine surgery. The Spine Journal. 2016;16(10):S363–S364. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2016.07.488
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    2. Kay HF ,
    3. Chotai S ,
    4. Wick J , et al
    . Does number of reported drug allergies affect patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction following operative treatment for degenerative lumbar spine disease. The Spine Journal. 2015;15(10):S94. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.031
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    2. Vaishnav AS ,
    3. Merrill RK ,
    4. Sandhu H , et al
    . A review of techniques, time demand, radiation exposure, and outcomes of skin-anchored intraoperative 3D navigation in minimally invasive lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(8):E465–E476. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003310
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    2. Vaishnav AS ,
    3. Saville P ,
    4. McAnany S , et al
    . Retrospective review of immediate restoration of lordosis in single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of static and expandable interbody cages. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;18(5):518–523. doi:10.1093/ons/opz240
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    2. Kumar A ,
    3. Merrill RK ,
    4. Overley SC , et al
    . Radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of the learning curve. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13(1):39–45. doi:10.14444/6006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    2. Vaishnav ASA ,
    3. Gang C ,
    4. Qureshi S
    . MIS discectomy and laminectomy. The Fellows Manual: Techniques of Spine Surgery. Mumbai, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers.
  11. 11.↵
    2. Harris PA ,
    3. Taylor R ,
    4. Minor BL , et al
    . The redcap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95(103208):103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    2. Harris PA ,
    3. Taylor R ,
    4. Thielke R ,
    5. Payne J ,
    6. Gonzalez N ,
    7. Conde JG
    . Research electronic data capture (redcap) -- a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    2. Vaishnav AS ,
    3. McAnany SJ ,
    4. Iyer S ,
    5. Albert TJ ,
    6. Gang CH ,
    7. Qureshi SA
    . Psychometric evaluation of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function computer adaptive testing in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: an analysis of responsiveness, coverage, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(17):717–729. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00306
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    2. Vaishnav AS ,
    3. Gang CH ,
    4. Iyer S ,
    5. McAnany S ,
    6. Albert T ,
    7. Qureshi SA
    . Correlation between NDI, PROMIS and SF-12 in cervical spine surgery. Spine J. 2020;20(3):409–416. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2019.10.017
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    2. Hung M ,
    3. Saltzman CL ,
    4. Kendall R , et al
    . What are the mcids for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI instruments among patients with spinal conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(10):2027–2036. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    2. Hinarejos P ,
    3. Ferrer T ,
    4. Leal J ,
    5. Torres-Claramunt R ,
    6. Sánchez-Soler J ,
    7. Monllau JC
    . Patient-reported allergies cause inferior outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(10):3242–3246. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3837-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    2. McLawhorn AS ,
    3. Bjerke-Kroll BT ,
    4. Blevins JL ,
    5. Sculco PK ,
    6. Lee Y ,
    7. Jerabek SA
    . Patient-reported allergies are associated with poorer patient satisfaction and outcomes after lower extremity arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(7):1132–1136. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.043
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    2. Coxe FR ,
    3. Wessel LE ,
    4. Verret CI ,
    5. Stepan JG ,
    6. Nguyen JT ,
    7. Fufa DT
    . Impact of patient-reported allergies on early postoperative opioid use and outcomes following ambulatory hand surgery. Hand (N Y). 2022;17(2):206–213. doi:10.1177/1558944720928483
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    2. Levin JM ,
    3. Boyle S ,
    4. Winkelman RD , et al
    . Patient-reported allergies are associated with preoperative psychological distress and less satisfying patient experience in a lumbar spine surgery population. Clin Spine Surg. 2018;31(7):E368–E374. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000665
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    2. Trief PM ,
    3. Grant W ,
    4. Fredrickson B
    . A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(20):2616–2621. doi:10.1097/00007632-200010150-00012
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    2. Strøm J ,
    3. Bjerrum MB ,
    4. Nielsen CV , et al
    . Anxiety and depression in spine surgery-a systematic integrative review. Spine J. 2018;18(7):1272–1285. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.017
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Patient-Reported Allergies Do Not Affect Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Spine Surgery
Patawut Bovonratwet, Avani S. Vaishnav, Jung Kee Mok, Zamie Abdullah, Mahie Abdullah, Evan D. Sheha, Steven J. McAnany, Catherine H. Gang, Sheeraz A. Qureshi
International Journal of Spine Surgery Mar 2023, 8420; DOI: 10.14444/8420
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords