Table 2

Published literature on minimally invasive SIJ fusion.

Inclusion criteria: indexed in PubMed, English language, fusion of the SIJ described as minimally invasive or percutaneous, and clinical outcomes available. Single patient case reports, imaging studies, and technique reports with no clinical outcomes are excluded. When multiple reports of the same cohort were published, only the most recent (longest follow-up) publication is summarized.

Author, YearStudy designNImplantTechniqueDemographics
Mean (±SD) or (range), unless otherwise specified
Results
Mean (±SD) or (range) unless otherwise specified
Complications (n)
Sturesson 201618Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
(Only surgical arm reported herein)
(iMIA,
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01741025)
52iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 49.4 (27-70)
years
Sex: 38F/14M Prior lumbar
fusion: 34.6%
Follow-up: 6mo
LBP VAS: 77.7 pre-op, 34.4 at 6mo for an improvement of 43.3 (25.0)
ODI: 56.6 pre-op; improvement of 25.5 at 6mo
90% very or somewhat satisfied
80% would definitely have the surgery again
Surgical time: 54 (19-107) min
Fluoroscopy time: 2.1 (1.0-4.0) min
Hospital stay: 3 (range 1-28) days
Within 180 days: 10 AEs in 9 subjects (0.19 events per subject), 8 severe AEs: device-related (0), procedure-related (2, both resolved).
Device- and procedure-related events: postop radicular pain resulting from implant protrusion into foramen (1, resolved), postop hematomas (2, resolved).
No subject has undergone late revision of implants.
Polly 201519
(prior pubs from same cohort/trial: Whang 2015 - 6mo results51)
Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
(Only surgical arm reported herein)
(INSITE,
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01681004)
102iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 50.2 (26-72)
years
Sex: 75F/27M
Prior lumbar
fusion: 39%
Follow-up: 12mo
VAS: 82.3 (11.9) pre-op, 28.3 (29.3) at 12mo
ODI: 57.2 (12.8) pre-op, 28.1 (20.8) at 12mo
Surgical time: 44.9 (22.3) min
Fluoroscopy time: 2.5 (3.6) min
EBL: 32.7 (32.8) mL
Hospital stay: 0.8 (range 0-7) days
Procedure-related adverse events within the first 6mo (180 days):
neuropathic symptoms (2), postoperative medical problems (4: urinary retention, nausea/vomiting, atrial fibrillation), SIJ pain or trochanteric bursitis (4), surgical wound problems (4), iliac fracture (1), asymptomatic physical examination
finding (1)
35 of 44
(NSM patients
that crossed over after 6mo visit)
iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 53.0 (11.5)
years
Sex: 20F/15M
Prior lumbar
fusion: 39%
Follow-up: 6mo post-fusion
VAS: 83.9 pre- op, 35.8 at 6mo post MIS SIJ fusion
ODI: 58.3 pre- op, 30.2 at 6mo post MIS SIJ fusion
Duhon 201631
(Prior pubs from same cohort/trial: Duhon 2015 - 12mo results52, Duhon 2013 - 6mo interim results53)
Prospective, multicenter
(SIFI,
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01640353)
172iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 50.9 (24-72) years
Sex: 120F/52M
Prior lumbar fusion: 44%
Follow-up: 24mo
VAS SI joint pain: 79.8 (12.8) pre-op, 30.4 (27.6) at 12mo, 26.0 (26.7) at 24mo
ODI: 55.2 (11.5) pre-op, 31.5 (19.2) at 12mo, 30.9 (20.5) at 24mo
SF-36 PCS: 31.7 (5.6) pre-op, 40.5 (9.6) at 12mo, 40.7 (10.3) at 24mo
SF-36 MCS: 38.5 (11.3) pre-op, 48.2 (12.3) at 12mo, 49.0 (11.5) at 24mo
EQ-5D TTO: 0.43 (0.18) pre-op, 0.71 (0.20) at 12mo, 0.71 (0.22) at 24mo
Surgical time: 46.6 (16.1) min Fluoroscopy time: 2.7 (1.8) min
EBL: 51.0 (75.8) mL
Hospital stay: median 1 (range 0-7) day
Device-related:
Neuropathic pain related to device malposition (3), SI joint or buttock pain (2), SI joint pain after fall associated with inadequate device placement (1), Hip pain related to periosteal bone growth around implant (1)
Procedure-related:
Wound drainage/irritation/infection (6), SI joint pain (5), SI joint pain (inadequate stabilization) (3), implant impingement (3), nausea/vomiting (3), buttock pain (2), foot weakness related to anesthesia (1), urinary retention (1), vascular injury (1), wound numbness (1)
Capobianco 201554Prospective, multicenter
(SIFI, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01640353)
Subsets
20
(Females with PPGP)
iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 43.3 (9.0)
years
Sex: 20F
Prior lumbar
fusion: 30%
Follow-up: 12mo
VAS SI joint pain: 81.9 (10.0) pre-op, 21.3 (17.6) at 6mo, 31.4 (30.9) at 12mo
ODI: 52.2 (12.7) pre-op, 30.4 (20.0) at 6mo, 32.8 (21.4) at 12mo
SF-36 PCS: 32.0 (5.6) pre-op, 40.0 (11.1) at 6mo, 41.6 (10.8) at 12mo
SF-36 MCS: 42.2 (12.4) pre-op, 49.7 (9.6) at 6mo, 49.0 (10.8) at 12mo
EQ-5D TTO: 0.42 (0.14) pre-op, 0.72 (0.23) at 6mo, 0.72 (0.21) at 12mo
100% very or somewhat satisfied
37 total adverse events (1.8 event rate per subject)
4 device/procedure-related: wound infection (2), numbness around wound (1), fall causing SI joint pain (1)
100
(Females with No
PPGP)
iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 52.5 (11.1)
years
Sex: 100F
Prior lumbar
fusion: 42.2%
Follow-up: 12mo
VAS SI joint pain: 79.9 (13.3) pre-op, 31.5 (27.0) at 6mo, 32.7 (28.5) at 12mo
ODI: 55.0 (11.2) pre-op, 31.0 (18.7) at 6mo, 30.8 (19.1) at 12mo
SF-36 PCS: 31.1 (5.6) pre-op, 40.5 (9.2) at 6mo, 40.0 (9.6) at 12mo
SF-36 MCS: 37.7 (11.6) pre-op, 48.8 (10.8) at 6mo, 47.7 (12.9) at 12mo
EQ-5D TTO: 0.43 (0.18) pre-op, 0.70 (0.19) at 6mo, 0.70 (0.20) at 12mo
84% very or sovmewhat satisfied
158 total adverse events (1.6 event rate per subject)
10 device/procedure-related: buttock pain (2), post-op neuropathy (1), post-op nausea/vomiting (3), intraop hemorrhage (1), neuropathy after contralateral SIJ fusion revision (1), urinary retention (1), would drainage (1)
52
(Men)
iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 50.7 (11.4)
years
Sex: 52M
Prior lumbar fusion: 51.6%
Follow-up: 12mo
VAS SI joint pain: 78.9 (12.9) pre-op, 30.2 (28.0) at 6mo, 25.0 (24.0) at 12mo
ODI: 56.7 (11.5) pre-op, 36.4 (21.4) at 6mo, 31.9 (18.9) at 12mo
SF-36 PCS: 32.7 (5.5) pre-op, 39.8 (10.1) at 6mo, 40.5 (8.9) at 12mo
SF-36 MCS: 38.6 (10.3) pre-op, 45.1 (13.2) at 6mo, 48.0 (12.1) at 12mo
EQ-5D TTO: 0.45 (0.19) pre-op, 0.64 (0.25) at 6mo, 0.72 (0.19) at 12mo
91.3% very or somewhat satisfied
88 total adverse events (1.7 event rate per subject)
7 device/procedure-related: wound infection (2), buttock pain (1), post-op neuropathy (1), SI joint pain (2), staple irritation (1)
Vanaclocha 201430Single center case series24iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 47.4 (3271) years
Sex: 15F/9M
Prior lumbar fusion: 2
Follow-up: 23 mo (1-4.5 years)
VAS: 8.7 pre-op, 1.7 at 1yr, 2.1 at 4.5yrs
ODI: 54.1 pre- op, 14.3 at 1yr, 16.3 at 4.5yrs
Surgical time: 48 (range 40-65) min
EBL: 58 (range 40-70) mL
Immediate post-op pain (4-resolved), temporary post-op radicular pain (2)
Rudolf 201433Single center case series17iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 58 (36-85)
years
Sex: 13F/4M
Prior lumbar
fusion: 8 (47%)
Follow-up: 60 mo
Bridging bone: 87% (13/15)
VAS: 8.3 (1.4) pre-op, 3.4 (2.4) at 1yr, 1.4 (2.6) at 2yrs, 2.4 (2.2) at
5yrs
ODI: 21.5 (22.7) at 5yrs
Surgical time: 65 (18) min
No intraoperative complications, hematoma (1), cellulitis (2), deep wound infection secondary to diverticulitis (1)
Sachs 201432Multicenter, retrospective144iFuse Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 58 (30-89)
years
Sex: 30F/10M
Prior lumbar fusion: 62%
Follow-up: 16
(12-26) mo
VAS: 8.6 pre-op, 2.7 at follow-up
91% Very or somewhat satisfied
91.7% would have surgery again
Surgical time: 73min
EBL: 31mL
Hospital stay: 0.8 days
No intraoperative complications.
28 post-op complications, most common: fall (5), trochanteric bursitis (4), piriformis syndrome (3), facet pain (3).
1 implant revision (1-year revision rate 0.7%),
Sachs 201355Single center, retrospective case series40iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 58 (30-81) years
Sex: 30F/10M Prior lumbar
fusion: 30%
Follow-up: 12 mo
VAS: 8.7 (1.5) pre-op, 0.9 (1.6) at 12mo
98% reached MCID
100% patient satisfaction
Piriformis syndrome (1), new LBP (1), facet joint pain (8), trochanteric bursitis (2)
Cummings 201343Single center, retrospective case series18iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 64 (39-81)
years
Sex: 12F/6M
Prior lumbar fusion: 61%
Follow-up: 12 mo
VAS: 8.9 (1.9) pre-op, 2.3 (2.1) at 12mo
90% reached MCID
ODI: 52.6 (18.8) pre-op, 13.2 (12.6) at 12mo
SF-12 PCS: 37.8 (10.4) pre-op, 44.6 (10.5) at 12mo
Trochanteric bursitis (3), hematoma (1), fluid retention (1), toe numbness (1), implant malposition (1)
Gaetani 201329Single center, retrospective case series10iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 53.2 (36-71)
years
Sex: 12F Prior
lumbar fusion: 8.3%
Follow-up: 10
(8-18) mo
VAS: 7.7 (1.3) pre-op, 3 (1.2) at
follow-up
ODI: 31.4 (6.3) pre-op, 12 (3.5) at follow-up
RDQ: 17.6 (1) pre-op, 3 (4.1) at follow-up
Surgical time: 65 (16) min
EBL: <45 mL
3 month CT scans show initial fusion
Local hematoma (2), low back pain (1)
Schroeder 201344Single center, retrospective case series6iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 50 (25-60)
years
Sex: 6F/0M Prior
lumbar fusion: 100% (deformity correction) Follow-up: 10.25
(4-15) mo
VAS: 7.83 pre- op, 2.67 at follow-up
ODI: 22.1 pre- op, 10.5 at follow-up
Hospital stay: 2 days (range 1-4) Bony bridging seen in 4 patients
No intraoperative or post-operative complications.
Rudolf 201341Single center, sub-group analysis40iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachSubgroup analysis from Rudolf 2012 to assess effect of prior lumbar fusion or lumbar treatment on outcomes. Follow up: 12 and 24 months
18 (no prior fusion)iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 49 (12)
Sex: 12F/6M
VAS decrease at 12mo: -5.94 (3.3)
VAS decrease at 24mo: -5.47 (2.88)
Surgical time: 60 (19) min
Superficial cellulitis (2), wound infection (1), revision for implant malposition (1)
15 (prior fusion)iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 58 (11)
Sex: 11F/4M
VAS decrease at 12mo: -3.50 (3.46)
VAS decrease at 24mo: -5.81 (2.88)
Surgical time: 64 (19) min
Superficial cellulitis (2), buttock hematoma (1), revision for implant malposition (1)
7 (prior concomitant lumbar pathology treated non-surgicallyiFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 58 (17)
Sex: 3F/4M
VAS decrease at 12mo:
-3.71 (3.11)
VAS decrease at 24mo:
-4.79 (4.28)
Surgical time: 64 (19) min
None
Endres 201338Single center, Retrospective case series19DIANA
cage
[Product not
approved for use in the US]
Posterior, longitudinally inserted into SI jointAge: 60.9 (36-76)
years
Sex: 5F/14M
Prior lumbar
fusion: 100%
Follow-up: 13.2
(6-24) mo
VAS: 8.5 (7.5-9) pre-op to 6.0 (2.2-9) at follow-up
ODI: 64.1 (40-82) pre-op to 56.97 (8-82) at follow-up
EBL: <150mL
Hospital stay: 7.3 (3-10) days
Fusion rate: 78.9% (15/19 joints), defined as lack of loosening and evidence of bone bridging around the implant
No neurovascular complications
Mason 201336Retrospective case series55HMA screw packed with DBMLateral approachAge: 57 years
Sex: 46F/9M
Prior lumbar fusion: 40%
Follow-up: 36
(12-84) mo
VAS: 8.05 (1.9) pre-op, 4.48 (2.81) at follow-up
SF-36PCS: 26.6 (15.2) pre-op, 43 (22.68) follow-up
Majeed scoring: 36.18 (15.08) pre- op, 64.78 (20.18) follow-up
Post-op nerve pain requiring reoperation (2)
Rudolf 201228Single center, retrospective case series50iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 54 (24-85)
years
Sex: 34F/16M
Prior lumbar fusion: 44%
Follow-up: 40 (24-56) mo
VAS: 7.6 pre- op, 2.0 at follow-up
82% reached MCID
82% patient satisfaction
Surgical time: 65 (26) min
Superficial cellulitis (3), deep wound infection (1), hematoma (2), reoperation (3)
Sachs 201242Single center, retrospective case series11iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachAge: 65 (45-82) years
Sex: 10F/1M
Prior lumbar
fusion: 18%
Follow-up: 12 mo
VAS: 7.9 (2.2) pre-op, 2.3 (3.1) at 12mo
Surgical time: 77.5 (31.8) min
EBL: 21.8 (18.9) mL
Piriformis syndrome (1), low back pain (1)
McGuire 201221Retrospective case series37Fibular allograft dowelsPosterior, longitudinally inserted into
SI joint
Age: 42.5 (23-63)
Years
Sex: 34F/3M
Follow-up: 39.6 (8-62) mo
Baseline VAS: 9.1 Final VAS: 3.4
Fusion rate: 89.5%
Nonunion requiring revision (4) (10.5%)
Khurana 200935Retrospective case series15HMA screw packed with DBMLateral approachAge: 48.7 (37.3-62.6) years
Sex: 11F/4M
Prior lumbar fusion: 40%
Follow-up: 17
(9-39) mo
SF-36 PF: 37.15 (14.28) pre- op, 79.33 (12.52) at follow-up
Majeed's: 37 (18-54) pre- op, 79 (63-96) at follow-up
Good to excellent results: 13/15 (87%) EBL: < 50 ml
Hospital stay: 2.7 (1-7) days
No post-operative neurological or wound complications.
Al-Khayer 200834Retrospective case series9HMA screw packed with DBMLateral approachAge: 42 (35-56)
years
Sex: 9F
Follow-up: 40 (24-70) mo
VAS decreased: 8.1 (7-9) to 4.6 (3-7)
ODI decreased: 59 (34-70) to 45 (28-60)
EBL: <50 ml
Hospital stay: 6.9 (2-11) days Return to work: 44.44%
Deep wound infection requiring debridement and IV antibiotics (1)
Wise 200837Single center
Prospective
cohort
13Titanium
cage
packed
with BMP
Posterior, Longitudinally inserted into SIJAge: 53.1 (45-62)
years
Sex: 12F/1M
Prior lumbar fusion: 61.5%
Follow-up: 29.5
(24-35) mo
Back VAS improved by 4.9 pts Leg VAS improved by 2.4 pts
EBL: < 100 ml
Hospital stay: 1.7 days
Fusion rate: 89% (17/19 joints) on CT at 6mo
Reoperation via open arthrodesis secondary to nonunion and persistent pain (1)
Comparative cohort studies of open surgery vs MIS
Ledonio 201445Single center, retrospective, comparative cohort study22iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachMIS Cohort
Age: 47.9 (13.1)
years
Sex: 17F/5M
Prior lumbar fusion: 64%
Follow-up: median 15
(12-26) mo
ODI: 61.5 (12.5) pre-op, 52 (16.9) at follow-up
Surgical time: 68.3(26.8) min
EBL: 40.5 (31.4) mL
Hospital Stay: 2.0 (1.5) days
Pulmonary embolism that resolved with treatment (1), revisions due to halo formation on the sacral side with recurring sacroiliac joint pain (2)
223 hole, 4.5mm plate, autograft packed within jointAnterior approach through an ilioinguinal incisionOpen Cohort
Age: 51 (9.4)
years
Sex:13F/9M
Prior lumbar
fusion: 50%
Follow-up: median 13 (11-33) mo
ODI: 61.8 (10.8) pre-op, 47.4 (21.7) at follow-up
Surgical time: 128 (27.9) min
EBL: 168.8 (479.0) mL
Hospital Stay: 3.3 (1.1) days
Pulmonary embolism (1), revision due to failed implant and nerve root irritation (2)
Ledonio 201446Multicenter, retrospective, comparative cohort study17iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachMIS Cohort
Age: median 66 (39-82) years
Sex: 11F/6M
Prior lumbar fusion: 82%
Follow-up: 12 mo
Values reported as median (range)
ODI: 53 (14-84) pre-op, 13 (0-38) at 12 mo
Surgical time: 27 (18-72) min
Hospital Stay: 1 (1-2) days
Transient trochanteric bursitis (3), hematoma (1), transient toe numbness (1), revision due to malpositioned implant (1)
223 hole, 4.5mm plate, autograft packed within jointAnterior approach through an ilioinguinal incisionOpen Cohort
Age: median 51 (34-74) years
Sex: 82F/32M
Prior lumbar fusion: 47%
Follow-up: 24 mo
Values reported as median (range)
ODI: 64 (44-78) pre-op, 46 (10-80) at 12 mo
Surgical time: 128 (73-180) min
Hospital Stay: 3 (2-6) days
Pulmonary embolism (1), revision due to failed implant and nerve root irritation (2)
Graham- Smith 201326Multicenter, retrospective comparative cohort study114iFuse
Implant
System
Lateral approachMIS Cohort
Age: 57.4 (14.0)
years
Sex: 82F/32M
Prior lumbar fusion: 47.4%
Follow-up: 24 mo
VAS: 8.3 (1.6) pre-op, 2.3 (2.6) at 12mo, 1.7 (2.9) at 24mo
MCID: 86% reached at 12mo, 82% at 24mo
Surgical time: 70 (24) min
EBL: 33 (27) mL
Hospital stay: 1.3 (0.5)
Days
No intraoperative.
Postop repositioning of implants (4), 3.5% (4/114).
149Screws, platesOpen posterior approachOpen Cohort
Age: 45.8 (11.3)
years
Sex: 103F/46M
Prior lumbar fusion: 23.5%
Follow-up: 24 mo
VAS: 7.1 (1.9) pre-op, 4.6 (3.0) at 12mo, 5.6 (2.9) at 24mo
MCID: 61% reached at 12mo, 50% at 24mo
Surgical time: 163 (25) min
EBL: 288 (182) mL
Hospital stay: 5.1 (1.9)
Days
No intraoperative.
Postop removal of implants (66), 44% (66/149).
  • NOTE: The table excludes 3 systematic reviews:

  • Zaidi - J Neurosurg Spine 201549: systematic review of studies on SIJ fusion, includes open and MIS.

  • Heiney - Int J Spine Surg 201548: systematic review and meta-analysis of MIS SIJ fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.

  • Lingutla - Eur Spine J 201656: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies describing outcome of SIJ fusion in patients with LBP.

  • Abbreviations: SIJ: sacroiliac joint; MIS: minimally invasive surgery/surgical; F: female; M: male; EBL: estimated blood loss; mo: month; ODI: Oswestry Disability Index; VAS: Visual Analog Scale; NSM: Non-surgical management;

  • DBM: demineralized bone matrix; HMA: hollow modular anchorage; BMP: bone morphogenic protein.