Skip to main content
Log in

Two-year real-world results of lumbar discectomy with bone-anchored annular closure in patients at high risk of reherniation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the safety and effectiveness of limited lumbar discectomy with additional implantation of an annular closure device (ACD) among patients at high risk of herniation recurrence treated in routine clinical practice.

Methods

This was a prospective, single-center study of lumbar discectomy for sciatica caused by intervertebral disc herniation with adjunctive ACD implantation to reduce herniation recurrence risk among high-risk patients with large annular defects. Patients returned for follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Main outcomes included reoperation, herniation recurrence, back pain severity, leg pain severity, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The minimum important difference was defined as ≥ 20 mm decrease relative to baseline for leg pain severity, ≥ 20 mm decrease for back pain severity, and ≥ 15-point decrease for ODI.

Results

Among 75 high-risk patients (mean age 45 years, 59% female), the cumulative event incidence through 2 years was 4.0% for reoperation and 1.4% for herniation recurrence. Mean leg pain severity decreased from 73 to 6 (p < 0.001), back pain severity decreased from 51 to 13 (p < 0.001), and ODI decreased from 49 to 7 (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving the minimum important difference was 91% for leg pain, 65% for back pain, and 94% for ODI.

Conclusion

In patients at high risk of herniation recurrence following limited lumbar discectomy in routine clinical practice, additional implantation of an ACD was safe and reherniation recurrence rates were low at 2-year follow-up, which is favorably compared to reported rates in high-risk patients.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frymoyer JW (1988) Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med 318:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198802043180506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Knottnerus JA (2002) Predicting the outcome of sciatica at short-term follow-up. Br J Gen Pract 52:119–123

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA (1999) Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. N Engl J Med 340:418–423. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199902113400602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JA, Tans JT, Thomeer RT, Koes BW, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study G (2007) Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med 356:2245–2256. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa064039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kreiner DS, Hwang SW, Easa JE, Resnick DK, Baisden JL, Bess S, Cho CH, DePalma MJ, Dougherty P 2nd, Fernand R, Ghiselli G, Hanna AS, Lamer T, Lisi AJ, Mazanec DJ, Meagher RJ, Nucci RC, Patel RD, Sembrano JN, Sharma AK, Summers JT, Taleghani CK, Tontz WL Jr, Toton JF, North American Spine S (2014) An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J 14:180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller LE, McGirt MJ, Garfin SR, Bono CM (2018) Association of annular defect width after lumbar discectomy with risk of symptom recurrence and reoperation: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:E308–E315. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thome C, Klassen PD, Bouma GJ, Kursumovic A, Fandino J, Barth M, Arts M, van den Brink W, Bostelmann R, Hegewald A, Heidecke V, Vajkoczy P, Frohlich S, Wolfs J, Assaker R, Van de Kelft E, Kohler HP, Jadik S, Eustacchio S, Hes R, Martens F, Annular Closure RCTSG (2018) Annular closure in lumbar microdiscectomy for prevention of reherniation: a randomized clinical trial. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spengler DM (1982) Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 7:604–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ostelo RW, de Vet HC (2005) Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:593–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2940–2952 (discussion 2952)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kursumovic A, Rath S (2017) Performance of an annular closure device in a ‘real-world’, heterogeneous, at-risk, Lumbar discectomy population. Cureus 9:e1824. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1824

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kursumovic A, Rath SA (2018) Effectiveness of an annular closure device in a “real-world” population: stratification of registry data using screening criteria from a randomized controlled trial. Med Devices (Auckl) 11:193–200. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S167381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahlgren BD, Lui W, Herkowitz HN, Panjabi MM, Guiboux JP (2000) Effect of anular repair on the healing strength of the intervertebral disc: a sheep model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2165–2170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heuer F, Ulrich S, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2008) Biomechanical evaluation of conventional anulus fibrosus closure methods required for nucleus replacement. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 9:307–313. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI/2008/9/9/307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bailey A, Araghi A, Blumenthal S, Huffmon GV, Anular Repair Clinical Study G (2013) Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of anular repair in lumbar discectomy: two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31828b2e2f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bron JL, van der Veen AJ, Helder MN, van Royen BJ, Smit TH, Skeletal Tissue Engineering Group A, Research Institute M (2010) Biomechanical and in vivo evaluation of experimental closure devices of the annulus fibrosus designed for a goat nucleus replacement model. Eur Spine J 19:1347–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1384-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ran J, Hu Y, Zheng Z, Zhu T, Zheng H, Jing Y, Xu K (2015) Comparison of discectomy versus sequestrectomy in lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. PLoS ONE 10:e0121816. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ament J, Yang Z, Thaci B, Kulubya E, Hsu W, Bouma G, Kim KD (2018) Cost-effectiveness of a bone-anchored annular closure device versus conventional lumbar discectomy in treating lumbar disc herniations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bono CM, Leonard DA, Cha TD, Schwab JH, Wood KB, Harris MB, Schoenfeld AJ (2017) The effect of short (2-weeks) versus long (6-weeks) post-operative restrictions following lumbar discectomy: a prospective randomized control trial. Eur Spine J 26:905–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4821-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Intrinsic Therapeutics provided funding for data analysis and manuscript development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ardeshir Ardeshiri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AA, LM, and CT disclose consultancy with Intrinsic Therapeutics. The authors maintain full control of study data and agree to allow the journal to review the data upon request.

Research involving human participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 173 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ardeshiri, A., Miller, L.E. & Thomé, C. Two-year real-world results of lumbar discectomy with bone-anchored annular closure in patients at high risk of reherniation. Eur Spine J 28, 2572–2578 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06036-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06036-8

Keywords

Navigation