Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utilizing two surgeons for neuromuscular scoliosis suggests improved operative efficiency

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) patients tend to have significant comorbidities with complex medical and surgical histories. When undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF), NMS risks can be much higher than the idiopathic population. This study aimed to identify the impact of two experienced pediatric cosurgeons (CS) compared to a single spine surgeon (SS) on the intra- and postoperative results of NMS PSF.

Methods

A database of NMS patients who had undergone PSF 2016–2021 identified 53 patients, of which 32 were CS, while 21 were SS. Patients’ sex, age, weight, diagnosis, curve severity, fusion performed, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rates, hemoglobin, anesthesia and surgical times, length of stay, and complications were collected.

Results

Patient demographics were similar between groups. Curves were more severe in the CS group (p = 0.013). Intraoperatively, CS patients underwent larger corrections (p = 0.089) but in significantly shorter anesthetic (p = 0.0018) and operative (p = 0.0025) times. Blood loss and transfusions were similar. Postoperatively, intensive-care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay (LOS) were similar, but SS had higher rates of both unplanned ICU admissions (p = 0.36) and 30 day readmissions (p = 0.053). Complications overall were similar between the groups both within 30 days (p = 0.40) and in the short-term period (31–90 days, p = 0.76), though the CS cohort had less Grade 2 immediate postoperative pulmonary complications (p = 0.16).

Conclusion

Utilizing CS for NMS PSF has been found to reduce operative times. Downstream, additional potential impacts trended toward fewer unplanned ICU admissions, less-frequent postoperative pulmonary complications, and reduced 30-day readmission rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, BM.

References

  1. Lefter S, Hardiman O, Ryan AM (2017) A population-based epidemiologic study of adult neuromuscular disease in the Republic of Ireland. Neurology 88(3):304–313. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003504. (Epub 2016 Dec 7 PMID: 27927941)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morrison BM (2016) Neuromuscular diseases. Semin Neurol 36(5):409–418. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1586263. (Epub 2016 Sep 23 PMID: 27704495)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mary P, Servais L, Vialle R (2018) Neuromuscular diseases: diagnosis and management. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104(1S):S89–S95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.019. (Epub 2017 Nov 28 PMID: 29196274)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. “Neuromuscular Scoliosis.” Scoliosis Research Society, www.srs.org/patients-and-families/conditions-and-treatments/parents/scoliosis/neuromuscular-scoliosis. SRS. Date Accessed: May 4, 2022.

  5. Oskoui M, Coutinho F, Dykeman J et al (2013) An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol 55(6):509–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12080. (Epub 2013 Jan 24. Erratum in: Dev Med Child Neurol. PMID: 23346889)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benditt JO (2019) Respiratory care of patients with neuromuscular disease. Respir Care 64(6):679–688. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06827. (PMID: 31110036)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Camilleri M (2021) Gastrointestinal motility disorders in neurologic disease. J Clin Invest 131(4):e143771. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI143771. (PMID: 33586685; PMCID: PMC7880310)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayer OH (2015) Scoliosis and the impact in neuromuscular disease. Paediatr Respir Rev 16(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2014.10.013. (Epub 2014 Nov 5 PMID: 25434648)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy RF, Mooney JF 3rd (2019) Current concepts in neuromuscular scoliosis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 12(2):220–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09552-8.PMID:30941730;PMCID:PMC6542926

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma S, Wu C, Andersen T et al (2013) Prevalence of complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a literature meta-analysis from the past 15 years. Eur Spine J 22(6):1230–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2542-2. (Epub 2012 Oct 21. PMID: 23085815; PMCID: PMC3676557)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomez JA, Lafage V, Sciubba DM et al (2017) International spine study group. Adult scoliosis deformity surgery: comparison of outcomes between 1 vs. 2 attending surgeons. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(13):992–998. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002071. (PMID: 28098740)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ames CP, Barry JJ, Keshavarzi S et al (2013) Perioperative outcomes and complications of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in cases with single versus two attending surgeons. Spine Deform 1(1):51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2012.10.004. (Epub 2013 Jan 3 PMID: 27927323)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lak AM, Abunimer AM, Goedmakers CMW et al (2021) Single- versus dual-attending surgeon approach for spine deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 20(3):233–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opaa393. (PMID: 33372960)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bosch L, Boan C, Falk M et al (2017) The effect of two attending surgeons on patients with large-curve adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. Spine Deform 5(6):392–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.04.007. (PMID: 29050715)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwan MK, Chiu CK, Chan CY (2017) Single vs two attending senior surgeons: assessment of intra-operative blood loss at different surgical stages of posterior spinal fusion surgery in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 26(1):155–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4803-y. (Epub 2016 Oct 12 PMID: 27734195)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwan MK, Chiu CK, Hasan MS et al (2019) Perioperative outcome of single stage posterior spinal fusion for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (Cobb Angle ≥90°): the role of a dual attending surgeon strategy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(6):E348–E356. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002848. (PMID: 30130336.Does a dual attending surgeon strategy confer additional benefit for posterior selective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)? A prospective propensity matching score analysis)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hayes JW, Feeley I, Davey M et al (2021) Comparison of a dual-surgeon versus single-surgeon approach for scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 30(3):740–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06717-3. (Epub 2021 Jan 13 PMID: 33439334)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kwan MK, Chan CY (2017) Does a dual attending surgeon strategy confer additional benefit for posterior selective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)? A prospective propensity matching score analysis. Spine J 17(2):224–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.09.005. (Epub 2016 Sep 5 PMID: 27609611)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shrader MW, Wood W, Falk M et al (2018) The effect of two attending surgeons on the outcomes of posterior spine fusion in children with cerebral palsy. Spine Def 6(6):730–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.03.002. (PMID: 30348351)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dodwell ER, Pathy R, Widmann RF et al (2018) Reliability of the modified clavien-dindo-sink complication classification system in pediatric orthopaedic surgery. JB JS Open Access. 3(4):e0020. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00020. (PMID: 30882054; PMCID: PMC6400510)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hasler C, Brunner R, Grundshtein A et al (2020) Spine deformities in patients with cerebral palsy; the role of the pelvis. J Child Orthop 14(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.14.190141. (PMID:32165976; PMCID:PMC7043121)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fletcher ND, Bellaire LL, Dilbone ES et al (2020) Variability in length of stay following neuromuscular spinal fusion. Spine Deform 8(4):725–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00081-w. (Epub 2020 Feb 14 PMID: 32060807)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BM: made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work and made substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; drafted the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content; approved the version to be published; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. JMC, LS, NL, VJ, and PS: made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; revised the work critically for important intellectual content; approved the version to be published; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan Menapace.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Menapace: None, McCarthy: Orthopediatrics, speaker, Schultz: None, Leitsinger: None, Jain: None, Sturm: Nuvasive and green sun medical shareholder advisory board.

Ethical approval

This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for research purposes. We consulted extensively with the IRB of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center who determined that our study did not need ethical approval. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the IRB at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.

Informed consent

It is not needed due to retrospective study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Menapace, B., McCarthy, J., Schultz, L. et al. Utilizing two surgeons for neuromuscular scoliosis suggests improved operative efficiency. Spine Deform 11, 985–992 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00678-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00678-x

Keywords

Navigation