Abstract
Purpose
Neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) patients tend to have significant comorbidities with complex medical and surgical histories. When undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF), NMS risks can be much higher than the idiopathic population. This study aimed to identify the impact of two experienced pediatric cosurgeons (CS) compared to a single spine surgeon (SS) on the intra- and postoperative results of NMS PSF.
Methods
A database of NMS patients who had undergone PSF 2016–2021 identified 53 patients, of which 32 were CS, while 21 were SS. Patients’ sex, age, weight, diagnosis, curve severity, fusion performed, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rates, hemoglobin, anesthesia and surgical times, length of stay, and complications were collected.
Results
Patient demographics were similar between groups. Curves were more severe in the CS group (p = 0.013). Intraoperatively, CS patients underwent larger corrections (p = 0.089) but in significantly shorter anesthetic (p = 0.0018) and operative (p = 0.0025) times. Blood loss and transfusions were similar. Postoperatively, intensive-care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay (LOS) were similar, but SS had higher rates of both unplanned ICU admissions (p = 0.36) and 30 day readmissions (p = 0.053). Complications overall were similar between the groups both within 30 days (p = 0.40) and in the short-term period (31–90 days, p = 0.76), though the CS cohort had less Grade 2 immediate postoperative pulmonary complications (p = 0.16).
Conclusion
Utilizing CS for NMS PSF has been found to reduce operative times. Downstream, additional potential impacts trended toward fewer unplanned ICU admissions, less-frequent postoperative pulmonary complications, and reduced 30-day readmission rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, BM.
References
Lefter S, Hardiman O, Ryan AM (2017) A population-based epidemiologic study of adult neuromuscular disease in the Republic of Ireland. Neurology 88(3):304–313. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003504. (Epub 2016 Dec 7 PMID: 27927941)
Morrison BM (2016) Neuromuscular diseases. Semin Neurol 36(5):409–418. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1586263. (Epub 2016 Sep 23 PMID: 27704495)
Mary P, Servais L, Vialle R (2018) Neuromuscular diseases: diagnosis and management. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104(1S):S89–S95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.019. (Epub 2017 Nov 28 PMID: 29196274)
“Neuromuscular Scoliosis.” Scoliosis Research Society, www.srs.org/patients-and-families/conditions-and-treatments/parents/scoliosis/neuromuscular-scoliosis. SRS. Date Accessed: May 4, 2022.
Oskoui M, Coutinho F, Dykeman J et al (2013) An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol 55(6):509–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12080. (Epub 2013 Jan 24. Erratum in: Dev Med Child Neurol. PMID: 23346889)
Benditt JO (2019) Respiratory care of patients with neuromuscular disease. Respir Care 64(6):679–688. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06827. (PMID: 31110036)
Camilleri M (2021) Gastrointestinal motility disorders in neurologic disease. J Clin Invest 131(4):e143771. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI143771. (PMID: 33586685; PMCID: PMC7880310)
Mayer OH (2015) Scoliosis and the impact in neuromuscular disease. Paediatr Respir Rev 16(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2014.10.013. (Epub 2014 Nov 5 PMID: 25434648)
Murphy RF, Mooney JF 3rd (2019) Current concepts in neuromuscular scoliosis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 12(2):220–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09552-8.PMID:30941730;PMCID:PMC6542926
Sharma S, Wu C, Andersen T et al (2013) Prevalence of complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a literature meta-analysis from the past 15 years. Eur Spine J 22(6):1230–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2542-2. (Epub 2012 Oct 21. PMID: 23085815; PMCID: PMC3676557)
Gomez JA, Lafage V, Sciubba DM et al (2017) International spine study group. Adult scoliosis deformity surgery: comparison of outcomes between 1 vs. 2 attending surgeons. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(13):992–998. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002071. (PMID: 28098740)
Ames CP, Barry JJ, Keshavarzi S et al (2013) Perioperative outcomes and complications of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in cases with single versus two attending surgeons. Spine Deform 1(1):51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2012.10.004. (Epub 2013 Jan 3 PMID: 27927323)
Lak AM, Abunimer AM, Goedmakers CMW et al (2021) Single- versus dual-attending surgeon approach for spine deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 20(3):233–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opaa393. (PMID: 33372960)
Bosch L, Boan C, Falk M et al (2017) The effect of two attending surgeons on patients with large-curve adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. Spine Deform 5(6):392–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.04.007. (PMID: 29050715)
Kwan MK, Chiu CK, Chan CY (2017) Single vs two attending senior surgeons: assessment of intra-operative blood loss at different surgical stages of posterior spinal fusion surgery in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 26(1):155–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4803-y. (Epub 2016 Oct 12 PMID: 27734195)
Kwan MK, Chiu CK, Hasan MS et al (2019) Perioperative outcome of single stage posterior spinal fusion for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (Cobb Angle ≥90°): the role of a dual attending surgeon strategy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(6):E348–E356. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002848. (PMID: 30130336.Does a dual attending surgeon strategy confer additional benefit for posterior selective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)? A prospective propensity matching score analysis)
Hayes JW, Feeley I, Davey M et al (2021) Comparison of a dual-surgeon versus single-surgeon approach for scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 30(3):740–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06717-3. (Epub 2021 Jan 13 PMID: 33439334)
Kwan MK, Chan CY (2017) Does a dual attending surgeon strategy confer additional benefit for posterior selective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)? A prospective propensity matching score analysis. Spine J 17(2):224–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.09.005. (Epub 2016 Sep 5 PMID: 27609611)
Shrader MW, Wood W, Falk M et al (2018) The effect of two attending surgeons on the outcomes of posterior spine fusion in children with cerebral palsy. Spine Def 6(6):730–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.03.002. (PMID: 30348351)
Dodwell ER, Pathy R, Widmann RF et al (2018) Reliability of the modified clavien-dindo-sink complication classification system in pediatric orthopaedic surgery. JB JS Open Access. 3(4):e0020. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00020. (PMID: 30882054; PMCID: PMC6400510)
Hasler C, Brunner R, Grundshtein A et al (2020) Spine deformities in patients with cerebral palsy; the role of the pelvis. J Child Orthop 14(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.14.190141. (PMID:32165976; PMCID:PMC7043121)
Fletcher ND, Bellaire LL, Dilbone ES et al (2020) Variability in length of stay following neuromuscular spinal fusion. Spine Deform 8(4):725–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00081-w. (Epub 2020 Feb 14 PMID: 32060807)
Funding
No funding was received for this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BM: made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work and made substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; drafted the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content; approved the version to be published; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. JMC, LS, NL, VJ, and PS: made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; revised the work critically for important intellectual content; approved the version to be published; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Menapace: None, McCarthy: Orthopediatrics, speaker, Schultz: None, Leitsinger: None, Jain: None, Sturm: Nuvasive and green sun medical shareholder advisory board.
Ethical approval
This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for research purposes. We consulted extensively with the IRB of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center who determined that our study did not need ethical approval. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the IRB at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
Informed consent
It is not needed due to retrospective study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Menapace, B., McCarthy, J., Schultz, L. et al. Utilizing two surgeons for neuromuscular scoliosis suggests improved operative efficiency. Spine Deform 11, 985–992 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00678-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00678-x