Full Endoscopic Thoracic Discectomy: Is the Interlaminar Approach an Alternative to the Transforaminal Approach? A Technical Note

Background Various approaches are used for decompressive surgeries in the thoracic spine depending on the location and consistency of the pathology, always avoiding manipulation of the thoracic spinal cord. Recently, there has been an effort to achieve adequate results and reduce morbidity with minimally invasive surgeries. Good outcomes and the advantages of full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) have been proven for surgerical correction of herniated discs and stenoses in the lumbar and cervical spine. Similar evidence has recently been described for the thoracic spine, but it has not previously been reported in Brazil. Although the transforaminal approach is already established for the thoracic spine, the newly described interlaminar approach is equally efficient, and both techniques must be considered when treating thoracic spine diseases. The objective of the present article was to present the full endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal techniques in patients with symptomatic disc herniation of the thoracic spine, discuss the rationality for implementing FESS in thoracic spine, and discuss the rationality in choosing between both approaches.

Methods Two patients were submitted to thoracic FESS. A transforaminal approach was chosen for a T10-T11 foraminal disc herniation; an interlaminar approach was selected for a paramedian T7-T8 disc extrusion. Data regarding operating time, intraoperative images, hospital stay, visual analog scales before and after FESS, course of recovery, and surgery satisfaction were evaluated.

Results The patients had eventless surgeries, improved from preoperative pain without morbidity. Both were satisfied and recovered well. Hospital stay was less than 6 hours after surgery.

Conclusions Transforaminal and interlaminar FESS for thoracic disc herniation are safe, efficient, and minimally invasive alternatives.

Clinical Relevance Despite being an innovative technique with evident advantages, it should be carefully considered along with conventional technique for the treatment of thoracic spine diseases, since its clinical relevance is yet to be determined.

Level of Evidence 4.