ABSTRACT
Background Long-segment posterior fixation has been used as a mainstay treatment of spine fracture-dislocations. Studies using short-segment posterior fixation in cases of thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation are limited. We describe our experience of 26 patients with thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation treated by short-segment or long-segment posterior spinal fixation and fusion.
Methods This is a single-center retrospective study of 26 patients with thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation treated by long-segment (Group 1, n = 12) and short-segment posterior instrumentation (Group 2, n = 14). Clinical (visual analog scale [VAS], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), neurological (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] scale), radiological (kyphotic angle, translational percentage, and displacement angle), and surgical (blood loss, operative time) outcomes and complications were recorded with each method. The mean follow-up period was 8.64 months (6–20 months)
Results The mean duration of surgery was 3.92 ± 0.67 hours in Group 1 and 3.21 ± 0.54 hours in Group 2, and mean blood loss was 583.33 ± 111.5 mL and 478.6 ±112.2 mL in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < .05). There was no radiologically visible pseudarthrosis, implant failure, or screw breakage in either group at follow up with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the radiological outcome (P > .05). Two patients in Group 1 and 6 patients in Group 2 improved after surgery at least 1 ASIA grade. VAS and ODI improved in both groups at the final follow up.
Conclusions Short-segment fixation can be used for treating fracture-dislocation patients, as it results in less blood loss, decreased intraoperative time, and saves fusion segments with similar radiological and clinical outcomes as long-segment fixation.
Level of Evidence 3.
Footnotes
Disclosures and COI: The authors received no funding for this study and report no conflicts of interest. We conducted our study after obtaining institutional ethical clearance from the Ethical Committee of AIIMS Rishikesh, India. I certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed throughout this research.
- This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2021 ISASS