Abstract
Background The removal of a lumbar interbody cage in revision spine surgery can be challenging, as there is an increased risk of nerve injury and a protracted outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary results of uniportal full-endoscopic surgery for the removal of migrated and/or pseudarthrotic lumbar interbody cages.
Methods Three complex revision surgery cases with migrated and pseudarthrotic lumbar interbody cages are presented, and the endoscopic surgical technique is described. The clinical outcome was assessed with a visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up, while the radiologic outcome was assessed with pre- and postoperative x-ray and computed tomographic images. Full-endoscopic surgery was performed to extract the interbody cage, bypassing scar tissue of previous surgeries with the trans-Kambin approach. Foraminoplasty with manual reamers and/or a high-speed burr under direct endoscopic vision was performed to ensure the safety of the exiting nerve root during cage extraction. The retrieved cage was replaced with a large footprint, expandable titanium cage using the trans-Kambin approach.
Results In all 3 cases, different types of interbody cages (1 titanium, 2 polyetheretherketone, and 1 expandable titanium cage) were removed under direct endoscopic view. In 1 case, we were only able to partially remove an impacted polyetheretherketone cage from the interbody disc endoscopically. The postoperative outcome significantly (P < 0.05) improved compared with preoperative scores in all 3 cases with a follow-up of 6 and 12 months, respectively.
Conclusion In most cases, lumbar interbody cages can be safely removed with endoscopic surgery with good preliminary clinical outcome. Nonetheless, further clinical research with long-term follow-up is required.
Clinical Relevance Results indicate the feasibility of full-endoscopic removal of migrated and pseudoarthrotic lumbar interbody cages.
Level of Evidence 3.
- endoscopic surgery
- trans-Kambin fusion
- transforaminal approach
- migrated interbody cage
- pseudarthrosis
- revision spine surgery
Footnotes
Funding The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests Christian Morgenstern reports consulting fees and royalties from Hoogland Spine Products GmbH and Signus Medizintechnik GmbH
Disclosures C.M. reports consulting fees from Spineart SA as well as consulting fees and royalties from Hoogland Spine Products GmbH and Signus Medizintechnik GmbH. R.M. reports royalty fees from DePuy/Synthes and Interventional Spine Inc. and royalty fees from Joimax GmbH outside of the submitted work.
- This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2023 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.