Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1
Demographic data and surgical characteristics between visual analog scale pain groups.
Demographic Neck (n = 46) Neutral (n = 57) Arm (n = 19) Univariate Analysis, P Valuea Age 52.0 (49.0, 54.0) 48.0 (46.0, 51.0) 49.0 (45.0, 53.0) 0.307 Sex Men 24 (52.2%) 28 (49.1%) 7 (36.8%) 0.525 Women 22 (47.8%) 29 (50.9%) 12 (63.2%) Body mass index 28.5 (27.0, 30.1) 29.4 (27.8, 31.0) 30.1 (27.3, 32.8) 0.497 Smoking status Never 25 (45.3%) 29 (50.9%) 11 (57.9%) 0.824 Current 8 (17.4%) 13 (22.8%) 2 (10.5%) Former 13 (37.3%) 15 (26.3%) 6 (31.6%) Follow-Up, mo 20.2 (18.2, 22.3) 19.2 (18.0, 20.4) 20.7 (17.2, 24.2) 0.989 Worker's compensation received prior to surgery? No 37 (80.4%) 49 (86.0%) 17 (89.5%) 0.598 Yes 9 (19.6%) 8 (14.0%) 2 (10.5%) Levels fused 1 19 (41.3%) 18 (31.6%) 5 (26.3%) 0.357 2 17 (37.0%) 32 (56.1%) 9 (47.4%) 3 10 (21.7%) 7 (12.3%) 5 (26.3%) Revision surgery? No 42 (91.3%) 51 (89.5%) 17 (89.5%) — Yes 4 (8.7%) 6 (10.5%) 2 (10.5%) Data presented as n (%) and median (IQR). Kruskal-Wallis H test, Pearson Χ 2 analysis, or Fisher exact test were used to compare baseline demographics and surgical characteristics between groups.
aP < 0.05.
PROM Interval N (n = 46) NE (n = 57) A (n = 19) Univariate Analysis, P Value Multivariate Regression, β Coefficient (95% CI), P Value Paired Samples t Test Kruskal-Wallis H Test or χ2 Analysis PCS-12 Preoperative 32.7 (31.0, 34.5) 32.9 (30.9, 34.8) 35.3 (30.7, 39.9) N: <0.001aNE: <0.001aA: 0.064 0.762 N: -NE: 2.300 (−1.707, 6.306), 0.258A: −0.532 (−6.015, 4.951), 0.848 Postoperative 39.4 (35.9, 42.8) 41.4 (38.5, 44.4) 40.0 (34.1, 46.0) 0.617 Delta 6.6 (3.3, 10.0) 8.3 (6.0, 10.6) 4.7 (−0.3, 9.8) 0.323 RR 9.6% 12.1% 6.8% — 0.419 % MCID 39.1% 50.9% 36.8% 0.382 MCS-12 Preoperative 47.6 (43.8, 51.4) 46.4 (43.0, 49.7) 46.2 (40.8, 51.6) N: 0.401NE: 0.076A: 0.318 0.836 N: -NE: 3.772 (−0.551, 8.096), 0.087A: 4.791 (−1.066, 10.648), 0.108 Postoperative 45.8 (42.4, 49.2) 49.6 (46.7, 52.5) 49.8 (43.0, 56.6) 0.072 Delta −1.8 (−6.0, 2.4) 2.8 (−0.7, 6.4) 3.6 (−3.8, 11.1) 0.161 RR −7.7% 1.9% 4.3% — 0.130 % MCID 26.1% 40.4% 42.1% 0.255 NDI Preoperative 45.0 (41.0, 50.0) 47.0 (41.0, 52.0) 37.0 (28.0, 46.0) N: <0.001aNE: <0.001aA: <0.001a 0.177 N: -NE: −7.554 (−15.211, 0.103), 0.053A: −10.571 (−21.102, −0.041), 0.049a Postoperative 33.6 (26.6, 40.5) 27.5 (20.9, 34.1) 19.7 (10.6, 28.8) 0.063 Delta −11.6 (−17.4, −5.9] −19.3 (−25.0, −13.5) −17.4 (−25.8, −9.0) 0.330 RR 25.6% 40.0% 51.7% — 0.106 % MCID 45.7% 50.9% 52.6% 0.825 VAS neck Preoperative 6.5 (6.0, 7.0) 6.8 (6.2, 7.4) 4.3 (3.0, 5.5) N: <0.001aNE: <0.001aA: 0.025a 0.001a N: -NE: −1.020 (−2.128, 0.087), 0.071A: −1.170 (−2.782, 0.442), 0.153 Postoperative 4.2 (3.3, 5.1) 3.2 (2.4, 3.9) 2.5 (1.2, 3.7) 0.065 Delta −2.3 (−3.2, −1.4) −3.6 (−4.4, −2.7) −1.8 (−3.4, −0.2) 0.082 RR 34.2% 51.1% 29.1% — 0.197 % MCID 47.8% 59.6% 42.1% 0.302 VAS arm Preoperative 3.0 (2.2, 3.9) 6.8 (6.2, 7.4) 6.3 (5.1, 7.5) N: 0.362NE: <0.001aA: 0.001a <0.001a N: -NE: −1.521 (−2.921, –0.121), 0.034aA: −1.505 (−3.219, 0.210), 0.085 Postoperative 3.5 (2.6, 4.5) 2.8 (2.0, 3.6) 3.1 (1.6, 4.6) 0.541 Delta 0.5 (−0.6, 1.7) −4.0 (−4.8, −3.2) −3.1 (−4.8, –1.5) <0.001a RR 36.2% 58.7% 51.1% — 0.263 % MCID 19.6% 63.2% 42.1% <0.001a Note: NPreoperative, postoperative, and delta data are presented as mean (95% CI). Neck, neutral, and arm pain dominant groups outcomes compared with univariate analysis—paired samples t test, Kruskal-Wallis H testing with Dunn multiple pairwise comparisons conducted for post hoc analysis, or Pearson Χ 2 analysis—and multivariate regression. RR were defined as: (delta outcome score/[optimal outcome score – observed outcome score]), where the following optimal outcome scores were used: 100 (PCS-12 and MCS-12) or 0 (NDI). The percentage of patients reaching the MCID was based on the following threshold values: PCS-12, 8.1 points; MCS-12, 4.7 points; and NDI, 15 points. Multivariate regression analysis conducted using the neck pain dominant group as a baseline for comparison—controlling for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, (never, current, and former), follow-up (mo), and No. of levels fused.
aIndicates statistical significance (P < 0.05).
A, arm; MCID, minimum clinically important difference; MCS-12, Mental Component Score of the Short Form-12 Survey; N, neck; NDI, Neck Disability Index; NE, neutral; PCS-12, Physical Component Score of the Short Form-12 Survey; RR, recovery ratios; VAS, visual analog scale.
PROM Interval NAPD (ANR ≤1.0) (n = 91) APD (ANR >1.0) (n = 31) Univariate Analysis, P Value Multivariate Regression, β Coefficient (95% CI), P Value Paired Samples t Test Independent Samples t Test or χ2 Analysis PCS-12 Preoperative 33.1 (31.6, 34.5) 33.6 (30.6, 36.5) NAPD: <0.001aAPD: <0.001a 0.691 NAPD: -APD: 0.675 (−3.647, 4.998), 0.757 Postoperative 40.0 (37.6, 42.4) 41.8 (37.5, 46.0) 0.412 Delta 6.9 (4.8, 9.0) 7.7 (3.9, 11.6) 0.522 RR 10.2% 10.7% — 0.661 % MCID 41.8% 51.6% 0.340 MCS-12 Preoperative 47.0 (44.4, 49.7) 46.0 (41.9, 50.2) NAPD: 0.903APD: 0.031a 0.615 NAPD: -APD: 4.179 (−0.466, 8.823), 0.077 Postoperative 46.9 (44.5, 49.3) 52.1 (47.9, 56.3) 0.008a Delta −0.2 (−3.0, 2.7) 5.5 (−0.1, 11.0] 0.043a RR 0.0% 0.1% — 0.114 % MCID 30.8% 48.4% 0.076 NDI Preoperative 46.0 (42.0, 50.0) 42.0 (35.0, 48.0) NAPD: <0.001aAPD: <0.001a 0.243 NAPD: -APD: −9.808 (−18.053, –1.563), 0.020a Postoperative 31.9 (26.8, 37.0) 18.8 (12.2, 25.4) 0.011a Delta −13.9 (−18.0, –9.7) −22.8 (−30.2, –15.4) 0.038a RR 31.1% 51.7% — 0.059 % MCID 45.1% 61.3% 0.118 VAS neck Preoperative 6.5 (6.0, 7.0) 5.6 (4.8, 6.5) NAPD: <0.001aAPD: 0.001a 0.041a NAPD: -APD: −0.704 (−1.929, 0.552), 0.258 Postoperative 3.8 (3.1, 4.4) 2.5 (1.6, 3.3) 0.076 Delta −2.8 (−3.4, –2.1) −3.0 (−4.1, –1.8) 0.504 RR 41.2% 42.1% — 0.331 % MCID 51.6% 54.8% 0.748 VAS arm Preoperative 4.7 (4.1, 5.4) 7.0 (6.3, 7.7) NAPD: <0.001aAPD: <0.001a 0.001a NAPD: -APD: −0.942 (−2.268, 0.384), 0.162 Postoperative 3.3 (2.7, 4.0) 2.5 (1.5, 3.5) 0.264 Delta −1.4 (−2.2, –0.6) −4.4 (−5.6, –3.2) 0.001a RR 48.3% 57.4% — 0.499 % MCID 37.4% 61.3% 0.020a Note: Preoperative, postoperative, and delta data are presented as mean (95% CI). VAS ANR group outcomes compared with univariate analysis—paired samples t test, Kruskal-Wallis H testing with Dunn multiple pairwise comparisons conducted for post hoc analysis, or Pearson Χ 2 analysis—and multivariate regression. RR were defined as: (delta outcome score/[optimal outcome score – observed outcome score]), where the following optimal outcome scores were used: 100 (PCS-12 and MCS-12) or 0 (NDI).2 The percentage of patients reaching the % MCID was based on the following threshold values: PCS-12, 8.1 points; MCS-12, 4.7 points; and NDI, 15 points.3,4 Multivariate regression analysis conducted using the neck pain dominant group as a baseline for comparison—controlling for age, sex, Body Mass Index, smoking status, (never, current, former), follow-up (months), and No. of levels fused.
aIndicates statistical significance (P < 0.05).
ANR, arm neck ratio; APD, arm pain dominant; MCID, minimum clinically important difference; MCS-12 , Mental Component Score of the Short Form-12 Survey; NAPD, non-arm pain dominant; NDI , Neck Disability Index ; PCS-12 , Physical Component Score of the Short Form-12 Survey; RR, recovery ratios; VAS, visual analog scale.